Jump to content

John

Members
  • Posts

    53,760
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    455

Posts posted by John

  1. Another clear and dark night here last night. Probably a 7 out of 10 in terms of sky transparency. Naked eye limit at zenith was around magnitude 5.5. Again armed with the 12 inch dobsonian I covered targets in Leo, Virgo, Coma Berenices, Canes Venatici, Ursa Major, and finally Hercules and Lyra. I alternated between tougher and easy targets. I always try and find some easy targets at the end of a session rather than packing up on a negative note having not found something !
     
    In the Virgo / Coma Berenices area there are so many galaxies visible with this aperture that you can easily get lost - they keep popping into view as you sweep around with a low powered eyepiece. I found 75x (21mm eyepiece) was a good general viewing power last night to darken the background sky and then using 8mm (200x) or occasionally 6mm (265x) to tease out smaller, fainter targets (eg: the supernova). These are 100 degree field eyepieces though so you still see a decent amount of sky with them.
     
    In Leo:
     
    Double stars:
     
    Algieba (Gamma Leonis) and Iota Leonis
     
    Galaxies:
     
    NGC 2903
    NGCs 3226 and 3227 (a close pair just E of Algieba and quite faint)
    M105, M95, M96
    M65, M66, NGC 3628 (Leo Triplet)
     
    In Virgo:
     
    Double Star Porrima
     
    Galaxies:
     
    M61
    NGCs 4281, 4273, 4268 and 4277 (very faint) with supernova SN2020ftl shining dimly at around magnitude 14 just N of the core)
    Markarins Chain galaxies M86, M84, NGCs 4388, 4387, 4435 and 4438 ("The Eyes"), 4458, 4461, 4473 and 4477 (the last two are in Coma Berenices)
     
    Also in Coma Berenices:
     
    Galaxies:
     
    M64 (the "Black Eye" galaxy and it was showing the structure that it is named for)
     
    Globular clusters:
     
    M53 (nicely resolved at 200x, one of the more distant clusters)
    NGC 50503 (very, faint, indistinct and scattered globular cluster. Hard to see even with 12 inches of aperture and low power and hard to believe that its classified as a globular)
     
    In Canes Venatici:
     
    Globular cluster M3 (simply magnificent at 200x, resolved deep into its core and surrounding sprawling mass of stars)
     
    Galaxies: M51 and NGC 5195 (the "Whirlpool" and showing faint spiral structure, nearly at the zenith). M51 was clear in the 50mm finder scope as well.
     
    In Ursa Major:
     
    Galaxies:
     
    M81 and M82 (never miss the chance to see these two. M82 showing several dark rifts at 200x and M81 quite a bit of outer halo)
    M101 (not always easy to spot this faint face on spiral. It's big with a low surface brightness. Was visible as faint patch in 50mm finder last night which shows that the sky there was quite dark)
     
    In Hercules:
     
    Globular clusters:
     
    The "Great" globular cluster M13 and the also far from shabby M92 both showing very well as their home constellation climbed into the sky. As with M3 and M53 earlier, superb resolution at 200x with this aperture. The dark 3 bladed "Propeller" structure just off centre in M13 was clearly defined.
     
    Finally, in Lyra:
     
    The famous "Double, Double" Epsilon Lyrae very nicely split at 200x at at the same magnification the equally famous "Ring Nebula" M 57 showing some nice structure despite being still low in the sky.
     
    All in all, another very enjoyable session under the stars. And another clear one tonight perhaps ?.
     
    Attached is a recent image by Luca Grazzini of supernova SN2020ftl in Virgo mentioned above. It is a type 1a supernova and was discovered at magnitude 16 on the 2nd April. The host galaxy, NGC 4277 is 101 million light years from us.
     

    49771947577_92931a78cd_c.jpg

    • Like 5
  2. 2 hours ago, Frostak said:

    Thanks for the reply, I've read the review.  I was checking them out at FLO's site.
    From your review I gather that the 25mm might not be a good idea. Would you be able to suggest an alternative for lower power eyepiece (this is the eyepiece I need to replace the most) in similar price point (at around 50 eur).

    A friend of mine who has the same scope that you do uses a Vixen NPL 30mm as his lowest power eyepiece and likes it a lot. It is currently £35.00 from First Light Optics:

    https://www.firstlightoptics.com/vixen-eyepieces/vixen-npl-eyepieces.html

     

     

    • Like 1
  3. I got this supernova again tonight. Similar observing conditions and the same scope. It seems a touch easier to pick up but that might just be because I now know where to look and what to look for.

    The SN is still a touch fainter than the magnitude 13.55 star just to the S of it so still around mag 14 I'd say.

    265x (Ethos 6mm) is doing the best job tonight. Nice wide field of view despite the high power.

     

    • Thanks 1
  4. It does not change the position of the optics so focus should not be affected. It does change the position of the eye in relation to the top lens of the eyepiece. The purpose is to allow different people to find a position where they can see the exit pupil of the eyepiece easily. People who wear glasses when observing usually find that having the eyecup in the lower position works best whereas those who don't wear glasses often find a higher position works for them.

     

    • Like 2
  5. 13 minutes ago, Stardaze said:

    Just looking at the 250 weights:

    SW: OTA 19kg, Box 25kg = 44kg

    Bresser: OTA 11.5kg, Box 16.4kg = 27.9kg

    The SW is 63% heavier = Wow!

    Quite a difference. What I potentially could gain in slightly reduced storage room, I'll lose out to with a slipped disc. I'll look at that storage! There's a tenner difference between them and the best focuser and bearings means a big thing. One review of the 250 SW flex tube suggested the alt bearings weren't great.

    Not sure about the total weight of the Skywatcher you have there. I've seen figures of 25kg and 27kg for the Skyliner 250PX solid tube. I used to own one and I don't think it was that heavy :icon_scratch:

    My old Meade Lightbridge 12 inch dob weighed around 40 kg all up - that one was a beast !

     

     

  6. Not the best transparency here but worth a shot at SN2020ftl with my 12 inch dob I thought.
     
    I managed to get the brighter pair of NGC 4281 and 4273 fairly easily laying N of a close triangle of stars. After a while, using high power (318x) I picked up the dimmer NGC 4268 and two faint star like points laying just W of NGC 4273. I think the N most of these was probably the supernova rather than the core of NGC 4277. Barely detected any sign of the home galaxy. The star N of the supernova suspect was magnitude 13.55 I believe and the suspect point of light was dimmer - maybe magnitude 14.2 or so ?.
     
    I found this sketch which shows the area quite well and the SN. I can't find who created it though otherwise I'd give them credit for it:
     

    post-53864-0-15057400-1586684022.jpg

    • Like 12
  7. To align the finder with the scope eyepiece, yes you do it that way. That should be a one-off adjustment which you can do in daylight using a distant target.

    Then, when you are using the scope at night, you do it the other way around and what you point the dot in your finder at, should then be in the eyepiece.

     

  8. Nice dark night here. Got the 12 inch dob out.

    My first target tonight was to be comet C/2019 Y4 Atlas which is in Camelopardalis (the Giraffe). I noticed from Cartes du Ciel that comet C/2107 T2 Panstarrs was in the same constellation tonight (not often you get two comets in the same constellation) so I also targeted that one.

    Despite being reported as more or less similar in brightness to T2 Panstarrs, I found Y4 Atlas quite hard to pick out. Got it in the end - rather dim, small but elongated patch of light. Needed 199x to pull it out clearly.

    T2 Panstarrs on the other hand was much easier to find, somewhat more extensive (75x was fine to see it well) and more condensed towards it's centre. A better comet to observe than Y4 Atlas by quite a margin tonight IMHO. Can't quite believe that it is no brighter than Y4 Atlas - it certainly looks brighter :dontknow:

    I also noticed that comet C/2019 Y1 Atlas was not far away in Cassiopeia (the Queen). That one was dimmer than Panstarrs but still a better looking patch of light than Y4 Atlas. Also tonight it's right alongside the lovely open cluster NGC 225 and they make a great pair in the 75x field of view of my Ethos 21mm eyepiece.

    So three comets thus far and clear dark skies forecast for the night. Happy bunny here :icon_biggrin:

     

     

     

    • Like 5
  9. I use a 7.2 - 21.5 zoom mostly for nighttime and occasionally when I do solar white light. I've been quite impressed by it. A touch narrow at the 21.5mm end (<40 degrees) but it does widen out to around 55 degrees at the other end.

    Mine seems to be a clone of the Hyperflex and Lunt zooms. Here I have the Baader 2.25x barlow attached which makes it a useful 9.4mm - 3.2mm high power zoom:

    zoombarlow.JPG.dcf205634f6e98d4e74183686fd728c1.JPG

     

    • Thanks 1
  10. 15 minutes ago, Beardy30 said:

     the 8se and 6se come with a 25mm EP ..should I get an extra one to get the best form either scope ? 

    You are going to need 3 or 4 eyepieces to get the best from a scope. The 25mm is a low(ish) power eyepiece. Something around 15mm and also 10mm or 8mm will be very useful indeed.

    The BST Starguiders are well thought of for £50 apiece. Decent plossls would also be OK and can be had for around £30 each.

     

  11. The red dot does not show in the eyepiece of the scope.

    You align the scope so that the red dot viewed through the finder is lined up to exactly match (as far as possible) what is in the centre of the eyepiece. So using a distant object (needs to be a few hundred metres away) helps to do this alignment (a one-off process) before attempting to use the scope at night.

     

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.