Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

Beardy30

Members
  • Posts

    1,015
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Beardy30

  1. 9 hours ago, jambouk said:

    Yes it’s a nice scope and lots of stuff on here about them. Tripod is not stunningly stable but for the price I’m not sure there is anything better. The optics are good. For brighter, smaller, DSOs is ok, but this isn’t a scope for visual work on DSOs on the whole, it is for planets and the Moon and the Sun (with appropriate filters). 
     

    Goto can be pretty accurate, but it is a basic end mount and a very long focal length, so can at times be hit and miss, depends how much patience and tinkering you want to do. 
     

    Mine served me well, and I wouldn’t get rid of it, but it is unlikely the set up you'll use regularly if you seriously get into the hobby I suspect.

    James

    Unlikely I’d used the set up? Why is that ? Is it not worth the purchase , sounds like a re think is needed here cheers 

  2. 1 minute ago, Greymouser said:

    I agree with John, the C5 is more versatile, as well as being very light. I have one, which I got with the omni EQ mount. ( only added £ 29 to the price of the OTA. )  I have not used the mount yet and use the tripod for a Sky Tee 2. I am pretty sure that you can use the .63 reducer with the C5, though have not done so yet, which gives me a F10 and a F 6.3 scope. I also have the  Evoulton ( C 9.25, )  mount, which I can highly recommend, though again another boost in budget, but better than the SE, I am told. You can get a Evo 5.  :smiley:

    Edit: I use the C5 on a AZGTi mount.

    Sorry mate but as a newbie I’ve no idea what any of that means 😂

  3. 5 minutes ago, Paul M said:

    Too specific a question for me to answer. Just thinking that you are attracted to the compact catadioptric design with Goto. It's a huge market with room for 50 different opinions and recomendations.

    The Celeston 127 Mak is a great little scope in my experience. I was just thinking about future proofing yourself a bit and upsize at the outset. I'm not familiar with all the brands and their ever so similar models!

    Thanks Paul 

    • Like 1
  4. 2 minutes ago, John said:

    The additional 25mm of aperture is the difference. £400 would very nearly buy you a new 10 inch dobsonian which would massively outperform both these scopes on all objects visually.

    Worth bearing in mind.

     

     

    I’m not a fan of the dob personally - to big for me and I love the goto sky align system on the Celestron 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.