Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

  • entries
    4
  • comments
    19
  • views
    4,002

Small refractors, urban skies


Stu

1,514 views

I thought I would start this off as a way of logging what is possible with a small refractor under poor, urban skies.

By poor, what do I mean? Well I live a few miles south of Heathrow, which basically wipes out most things to the north. I am on the edge of Walton on Thames, and have a relatively decent southern view over fields, but there are houses in the way so the seeing is often mixed.

My NELM is normally around 4.2 to 4.5 but can be better or much worse depending on the transparency. Background sky brightness is around 18 to 18.5 in the best direction, so many galaxies are a challenge.

For reasons of convenience, and because I love them, I have a collection of smallish, but decent quality refractors which are my most commonly used scopes.

TV76

TV Genesis

Astrotech 106mm EDT

The first two are small and light enough to use on a mini giro on an Induro AT413 tripod, very quick to set up and pack down. The triplet is heavier and I normally use that on an EQ6 tripod, previously with a giro but will use on the mini until it sells!

So, just a quick comment on last night. I had been playing with the collimation on the Genesis so thought I would give it a try out. I had a quick half hour under some nice skies before going out. I was just testing really, but had nice views of Jupiter with GRS, M45 and M42. This scope is lovely for flat, widefield views; at 500mm focal length, a 21mm ethos gives a 4.2 degree field of view, a 17mm gives 3.4. Under a dark sky (which I have yet to get it under!) objects like the Veil and NA nebula should be lovely, particularly with Lumicon UHC filter.

I will try to post up about what is achievable/visible in these scopes under my skies as a reference for people.

One example of the challenges.... Many of you will have seen the SN in M82 which is a relatively easy target under reasonable skies or with a little more aperture. With my 106, I just about managed it using averted vision. It was probably one of the hardest things I have managed to observe. On another occasion with my 12", it was trivially easy to see! Just finding M82 under light polluted skies can be a challenge in itself!

I tried to see comet Panstarrs (whichever one it was ....), and eventually concluded that it was invisible from my skies. I tried scope and binoculars, but it was hopeless. I visited a relative in Bakewell and found it within seconds in the binoculars.

Background sky brightness and surface brightness of objects are key to understanding what is visible and what is not. I will confess to a little frustration, seeing posts on here discussing light polluted skies, followed by reports I can only dream of from home. I think there is a big difference between local light pollution in the form of nearby streetlights and houses, vs the horrible orange grey glow which hangs over the larger cities. If your sky is fundamentally ok, then it is possible to block out local annoyances. The other way round there is nothing you can do.

So, my aim is to focus on what can be achieved with limited aperture kit under poor skies, how to identify good targets (ie visible!) and a description of what I have seen.

The answer generally at the moment is 'very little cos it's cloudy', but I shall be back when it clears.

Cheers,

Stu

9 Comments


Recommended Comments

Stu

I got myself a 102ED for similar reasons this Winter and am awaiting a 12' Dob. Having been used to views through a 9.25 SCT, I was curious to see the differences between the apertures and types of scopes under my suburban skies.

Having a fairly large city to the North [Dundee] pretty much wipes out that side of the sky but South is out to farmland, so despite local light from houses and street lamps, it's not too bad. The MW is visible naked eye on good nights.

I'm trying to get a feel for which will be the most effective but have had so few clear nights this Winter that I'm no further forward.

My guess is that I'll end up keeping them all for differing uses.

I lived most of my life near Richmond, so know exactly what the LP is like around you :-)

Best

Duncan

Link to comment

Thanks for the comment Duncan. I would love to be able to see the MW from here, but I've only once had hints of it on a very clear dark night :-(.

In general, I reckon aperture always helps so the 12" should be very nice. Where aperture doesn't help very much at all is with low surface brightness objects. If the object is fainter than the sky background then it doesn't matter how much aperture you have, the object won't be visible.

I generally concentrate on planets, doubles, open and globular clusters from home, with the occasional look at something like M81/2. The other objects I tend to leave for holidays or rare star parties.

I do love refractors for the pin point star shapes and wide field views.

Cheers,

Stu

Link to comment

Nice realistic & informative report Stu.

 

Have you viewed Abireo in your TV's ? I f so how does they look ?

I am quite looking forward to viewing this blue and orange double star in the Pronto, that's if I can find it without the GoTo :-)

 

Shaun

Link to comment

Certainly have Shaun, at least I have in the 76. It's a really wonderful sight, the star colours are lovely. That's one thing I love about these scopes, looking at clusters and really seeing all the different colours peppering the view.

Easy enough to find, don't need Goto for that :-).

The Double Double splits very nicely in it too so it well worth a look.

Have you tried Almach? Another of my favourites, and if you fancy a challenge you could try Izar. That's really quite tight but I can split it with the 76.

Cheers,

Stu

Link to comment

It is supposed to be clear from 6pm here tonight Stu, If this turns out to be the case I will give your suggestions a try later. :-) 

I have viewed the Double Double and Almach :-) 

Link to comment

In my experience, observing with small scopes in urban skies can be pleasing as long as you adjust your expectations. For example, my 66mm ED refractor is never going to show me M31 in it's full glory from my heavily light polluted skies, but it does show me M31. Small refractors are perfect for widefield - the occasional cluster (probably shown almost as a smudge) and brighter nebula. Looking southwards towards the horizon however is off with the 66mm for me - it's the direction of the city centre. The main advantage with these small refractors is that they are light and easy to set-up which is especially good if you're tired from work ;).

 

My NELM is probably around 4.1, maybe 3.7 ish when looking southwards (where I do most of my observing!)

Link to comment

I agree Stu,  if I want to look at M31 I will use the T31 Nagler and my 9.25 as it fills the whole eyepiece.

 

The Pronto is brilliant on stars, I am sure I split Sirius with last week, it was shimmering like crazy and I am not sure if it was the twinkling effect that fooled me.

 

I can be observing within 5 minutes with both setups if I am honest,  being able to grab and go with the Pronto is very handy to say the least.

Link to comment

Agreed, but think about this. With the C9.25 and the nag you get a 1.1 degree field of view. That's only enough to fit the central core in really.

With the 76 and Pronto you get 5.3 degrees (maybe a little less due to field stop, not sure). Under a light polluted sky it will be fairly useless, but get somewhere really dark, with inky black skies and good dark adaptation and you can really begin to see the full extent of the galaxy. It is huge!

Link to comment

Yes I understand from previous threads it is big galaxy, We have a local dark site (20 mins drive) which is milky way dark and Antarctic cold. Saturday is forecast good and if it turns out to be so I will take the Proto over with me and check it out.

 

I am going to have to invest in a midrange eyepiece between 17.3 and 31mm, I was hoping to get the Antares 2" x 1,7 barlow but after 7 weeks of waiting I cancelled the order.

 

 

Shaun.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.