Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

MN 66 collimation


Recommended Posts

I have one question for owners of maksutov-newton scopes: witch collimation tools you use for collimation of this type of telescope? Witch one is best for this optical system,for you? I use chesire for secondary and laser collmator for collimation of primary mirror and I always think that picture can be better (although is great, compared with many other scopes).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is that the comaless object is determined by the corrector, not the primary, so you can't really expect to treat it like a Newtonian.

Treat it like a Newt and you'll avoid astigmatism (i.e. the entry pupil will be centred with respect to what you use as optical axis.)

Personally I'd collimate it like a Newtonian and then I'd do a star test to null coma, unless you can tweak the mechanics (i.e. ensure one way or another that if you do a Newt collimation, the reflected focuser axis hits the corrector squarely.) It is fairly important to ensure that the offset of the secondary is optimal, both towards the primary and away from the focuser on these scopes, or "Newtonian" tool collimation will say one thing and the star test another and you'll have to settle for a compromise.

Unfortunately, you probably can't use the Schmidt-Newton "blue ghost" trick with a Cheshire (which uses a ghost reflection on the inside of the Schmidt corrector). Well, it's possible you can, so you should at least try it, but my guess is that the shape of the corrector makes the blue ghost unusable.

Just in case:

Complete Collimation of the Meade Schmidt Newtonian - Article

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TBH, it's not that deifferent from uncorrected newtonians but IIRC, the trick with Mak-Newts is to ensure that after basic collimation with your tool of choice (laser, cheshire etc etc), that the diffraction rings are the same both sides of focus. That's what I've done with the MN's I've owned previously and it seemed to work pretty well. There is an article somewhere about Mak-Newt collimation on the net, a bit of a google search should do it.

Tony..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've a 6" Intes MN61. A well-collimated laser collimator can be used to get the tilt of the secondary correct but, so far, I've found star testing the best way to adjust the primary. Not that mine has needed much adjustment.

On the MN61 there is an alloy plug about 25mm in diameter in the center of the primary, it's part of the mechanism that holds the primary in place but it means that laser collimators and even conventional cheshires are not useful.

Once found, mak-newts do hold their collimation pretty well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.