Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Weird and unusal targets - for new knowledge and challenges


Rallemikken

Recommended Posts

Last year I stumbled upon a "targets-todo-list" here, and it kept me occupied for many nights. It was a list over odd and rare targets that seldom or never is mentioned. Along the way I learned a lot, about imaging, physics, the astromoners behind  and life in general. With an 8" reflector and a Canon DSLR I was able to get decent images of all, but one.

"The Galactic Wanderer", NGC 2419, was one of those, with a few peculiarities and a story to back it up. It was a target I could spend time on between the clouds while I was waiting for true clear skies. As weeks went by, I did the whole list with a few exeptions due to latitude.

I'm starting my fourth season this autumn, and I'd like to broaden my horizon. Any suggestions? Hopefully something I can try with pretty basic equipment? I'm also looking for pure beauty, small patches of sky that stands out without any Messier or NGC- number ????

NGC_2419.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you're looking for slightly off the beaten track try imaging the Hickson Compact Groups. There are 100 of them but a lot are southern hemisphere targets. I have started my own project on them but lack of clear nights mean that I might be dead from old age before completing them.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, DaveS said:

Hickson Compact Groups

Spot on! Some are small and very faint, though....   Found some data here: https://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/db-perl/W3Browse/w3table.pl?tablehead=name%3Dhcg&Action=More+Options  Have made a spreadsheet, will stitch it up in my obsy!! The biggest should be plain sailing, even with my 8" newt. Based on dec and angular size, at least 15 should be in reach. We'll see where the journey takes me!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ollypenrice said:

I think a lot of the potentially 'new objects' have been overlooked because they are too large to have been perceived as single structures.

Olly

Yes, and we can think a little more about composition; framing a bigger piece. I did a picture of Navi last winter, with the star a bit right and above of center. IC63 came in from underneath and left, and IC59 sideways on the same side a bit above. A gem! Far from my technically best image last winter, but it made it to top three and earned a frame in my living room. I like buzy regions around big stars with long spikes! Drama and beauty, but sometimes hard to handle......

Edited by Rallemikken
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.