Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

AS3! Problems


Recommended Posts

I did a two image stack of the Moon last night. Each of the subs were not exactly sharp, but were what I had, so I decided to stack them. The result, straight out of AS3! without any futher processing looks over-processed to me, especially considering the quality of the originals. Does anyone have any idea what is happening here? Both subs and the unmodified AS3! output image are attached, along with a screenshot showing the AS3! settings I used.

Luna_20230927_00_DSC_1506_quality_100%.png

Luna_20230927_01_DSC_1505_quality_98.46%.png

DSC_1471_lapl5_ap446_conv.png

AS3_Settings.jpg

Edited by Mandy D
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Mandy D changed the title to AS3! Problems

HI @Mandy D I believe its the "Sharpened" setting.

image.png.f39c567515cf690045a945bab5f6da88.png

Apologies if you've always used this without issue.  I've always found it too much and prefer to take the stack from AS!3 and run deconvolution etc elsewhere.

Can always deselect to easily test if it's not giving expected results this time

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@geeklee Thank you! I hadn't spotted that. I've just tried again and, yes, it is giving more the result I would expect. In the output folder it normally places two images and I now understand that one is the unsharpened and the other is the one that has been over-processed. I've always used the latter. I still have much to learn about this process. I'll stick to GIMP for sharpening, now. Thanks.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is my B&W result of stacking the best two images and no sharpening applied in AS3! Processing in GIMP, as follows:

Convert to B&W using mono mixer, dropping out the blue channel.

Adjust curves to deepen shadows and balance highlights.

Sharpen 0.500.

The result is much closer to what I was expecting and looking for. I wanted to pull out some detail of the crater in the second image. I'm going to have to get closer in next time, as I was only at 600 mm with 4.88 μm pixels. Last night was a rush job with poor conditions and sub-optimal equipment.

Luna_20230926_Run2.jpg

Lunar_Crater_20230926.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.