Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

Is my Whirlpool over exposed?


Recommended Posts

I got about 3h on the Whirlpool last night, but I am wondering if my exposure time was too long (120s) as it's quite a bright object. 

How do you guys decide on the right exposure time?

 

Whirlpool_Galaxy_first_night_DBE PI AFPs.jpg

Ok, I had a second run at this. Better, I think. Thanks for your advice!

 

Whirlpool_Galaxy_first_night_DBE PI2 AFP.jpg

Edited by StuartT
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What does a single sub look like?

Difficult to tell if you have just stretched it to this point or if it was like this in the subs. But i am going to guess that there is no way 120s on M51 would be overexposed. Its a bright object for a DSO, but its not really bright enough for you to accidentally saturate pixels with it.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suspect over-stretching as well. What did you use to process it? Did you capture with the 2600MC? I know that sensor is very sensitive but I'd be surprised if it blows out at 120s. For comparison, I was on M51 last night as well, and this is 3.5 hrs in 60s  subs with a 533MC (unity gain 100, offset 21). I believe Bortle 8 skies respond better to shorter subs. It's noisy, but not saturated.

Processed in APP with a 10% stretch, and finished with just a levels nudge in Gimp.

M51-RGB2.thumb.jpg.841b25cea7f1fbacf9cb321650877400.jpg

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Always do a few previews before running a plan, it wastes time but better than affecting all the subs. Looks like no detail is clipped so you can adjust the exposure or gamma to dial it down.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brilliant! Thanks everyone.

1 hour ago, ONIKKINEN said:

What does a single sub look like?

single subs actually look fine, so I guess I've just over stretched.

59 minutes ago, Padraic M said:

I suspect over-stretching as well. What did you use to process it? Did you capture with the 2600MC? I know that sensor is very sensitive but I'd be surprised if it blows out at 120s. For comparison, I was on M51 last night as well, and this is 3.5 hrs in 60s  subs with a 533MC (unity gain 100, offset 21). I believe Bortle 8 skies respond better to shorter subs. It's noisy, but not saturated.

Processed in APP with a 10% stretch, and finished with just a levels nudge in Gimp.

Yes, with the 2600MC. I pre-process in APP then finish off in PI and PS. My sky is not too bad (Bortle 5/6)

26 minutes ago, Elp said:

Always do a few previews before running a plan, it wastes time but better than affecting all the subs. Looks like no detail is clipped so you can adjust the exposure or gamma to dial it down.

good idea

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.