Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

H-Alpha Images Streaking...


pete_81

Recommended Posts

Went for North America Nebula the other night, and having already done some shots with astro-modded DSLR, thought to try Ha which would allow experimenting with the 7nm Baader, option for luminance layers (APP layering) and longer exposure experimentation.

Polar alignment was good enough for the evening (16" out) and plate solving successully pinned down the nebula. Guiding also running with dithering etc.

1702615699_PolarAlignment.thumb.png.b938a7284a4ab04e0ac56fc61621f5aa.png

But when the first of the (5min) Ha images popped up, I noted the bright stars were streaking with ISO 200 so thought I'd up ISO to see if it was just a display artefact and same thing.

1311477005_ScreenShot2021-10-04at16_22_27.thumb.png.5b52a6a900304548ca512f0960862449.pngISO 200

1433475986_ScreenShot2021-10-04at16_23_19.thumb.png.c55fc9e4b223b4b87ef6d74d876e4a99.pngISO 1600

Guiding looked OK with settings as used before, but obviously not sure what was going on. All 15 images were the same with streaky stars.
So reduced exposure to 2min and went for the visible (UV/IR filter) and those worked fine, so built up more images to stack with 2 & 3 min shots. No streaking on any of these.

Final stack from this session:

113114780_ScreenShot2021-09-28at15_20_18.png.1851337d78a1f54b6b4c83f2340f432d.png

Any ideas what the trails are caused by? It was quite breezy, but assumed the 3min exposures would have had similar artefacts if it was the wind catching the scope.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope, filter clean. Was cleaned with IPA just before going into the filter wheel and all inspected before closing the wheel. It was more the 'jittery' star trail that it has:

1043073348_ScreenShot2021-10-04at18_01_37.png.6ff3394b25790958fd334079f35b059d.png781917999_ScreenShot2021-10-04at18_01_49.png.077cb17bd5ab63471ce1bfde4db6cd79.png

To me, it looks like the guiding got lost for a bit. I had thought it was clear through the time the images were taken, and to all have the same effect (1hr15m) again doesn't fit this argument, bearing in mind the plate solving didn't need to move when changing to the UV/IR filter and target was bang centre.
Wondered if there was a dither setting wrong, but it's only using a couple of pixels every 3rd frame.
Best I can assume is the wind but seems odd that the shorter exposures (similar breezes) don't show (I didn't look at the guiding graph so it's more a lesson to watch and take diagnostics for everything if possible, hence doing the PA screenshot!).

Hmmm...
I'll do again at some point and watch guiding and so on I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.