Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Weird PEC result ...


Demonperformer

Recommended Posts

I got a PE recording last night - NEQ6, 2m scope, 0.66"/px, using Altair (after it had passed the meridian) - which has given a weird result in PECprep.

Firstly, in the analysis screen, I tried applying the autofilter:

02 Autofilter.jpg

Although 2 of the cycles lined up nicely, the other two (red & green) are totally out of sync with them. I found that removing the high pass filter, produced a result where all four traces were at least of a similar pattern and phase, if not exactly lined-up:

01 Mag max.jpg

Moving onto the PEC screen, when applying all four traces, I get a peak PE+ of 8.56" and a peak PE- of -6.59", which looks about right for the graph:

03 PEC 4-4.jpg

However, looking at the lower graph on the page, the red line is clearly the "odd one out", so I tried removing it:

04 PEC 3-4.jpg

This shows the three remaining traces much more aligned, and a correction curve pretty similar to the previous one. It states that my peak PE- has now reduced to -3.61" (which looks about right), but that my peak PE+ has INCREASED to 11.60" - which I can't see from the graph at all, it looks about +3/+4 to me.

But let's move on to the frequency spectrum:

05 FS all.jpg

This states that the biggest component is something with a period of 675.5 - which does not seem to match anything in the system! Furthermore, there is a small peak at 134.9, which is very close to the 4th harmonic of 675.5 (which would actually be 135.1). In addition, the high 470's, where we would expect a massive peak as this is the frequency of the worm gear, there is a massive trough, although the 2nd, 3rd & 4th harmonics do line-up with smaller peaks:

06 FS 8%.jpg

All-in-all, I am at a total loss to know what to make of it all. My best guess would be to ignore the high-pass filter and remove the red trace (ignoring what it says about the peak PE+ having increased). I have saved both the "EQMOD PEC file" and the "Smoothed PE file" (would guess the former is the one I should be using). If anyone has any ideas what is going-on, I would be most interested.

Thanks.

pe_raw_data_2016_10_3_20_43.txt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.