Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

Back to Cygnus


Recommended Posts

With Cygnus so well placed at the moment I decided to try it again at 50mm, with the goal of bringing out the Ha regions. To give myself the best chance I opened up the aperture a bit more, ran slightly longer subs and managed a longer imaging run from (I think) a slightly darker site. I also had the advantage of imaging in full astronomical darkness this time, with Cygnus traversing the meridian. Here's my work in progress image:

14837097603_521526b9d2_b.jpg

I was a little disappointed with the first result. Despite having more than twice as much data this time - 1 hour 30 minutes - after aligning the channels and stretching I was still left with a very monochromatic image. Boosting the saturation much left it looking quite odd. I then tried re-stacking with the previous session in a second group in DSS, giving over 2 hours total integration time. Again, the same problem.

Thinking it over, I suspect the problem is signal-to-noise. My unmodded camera blocks about three quarters of the Ha signal anyway, but the Ha-to-noise and LP ration will be far worse than this compared to a full spectrum camera at a dark site. So an LP filter might not only help remove gradients and capture fainter details, it may help me bring out the Ha regions too.

In the end I got a little creative. I took a copy of the red channel only and used the magic select tool to round up the nebulous regions, and blended it into the original image. It's not quite cheating - if I wasn't picking up the nebulosity I wouldn't be able to magic select them - but it's not quite right either. I couldn't select the faintest Ha regions this way where they blend into the background of the Milky Way, so there is a bit of an abrupt transition between the bright Ha regions and their surroundings. Hopefully I can manage a more subtle version. one idea I'm toying with is taking the red channel and subtracting the green channel from it, to produce a very crude Ha layer.

I feel I'm making some progress anyway. :) I've been working my way through some basic astrophotography and Photoshop tutorials and am slowly getting more comfortable with the it.

Image details:

~1 hour 30 minutes of data with 150 second subs at f3.5, 12 darks, 20 dark bias, no flats +

~35 minutes of 120 second subs at f4.0, 10 darks, 20 dark bias, no flats.

DSS was counting over 13,000 stars in the subs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.