Finding a telescope or binocs for 60$

[Bloodypredator]

Does it go off topic ? : what can you see with a firstscope clone ? ; 76/300?

[Schorhr]

As I said in the reply to your message -

In theory it shows the same as any other 76mm reflector telescope.

Alex posted a great link and I sent you a link to a image of different sketches and pictures through the finder to give you a expression of aparent field of view and outer blur.

The clones (such as from Relaxdays or Seben) don't have a finderscope and AFAIK adjusting involves tinkering. That's the worst part in my oppinion, but they still work.

But:

A 76mm newton with 900mm will have less issues with spherical abberation, Koma and a sharp(er) outer field on cheap eyepieces.

Under f/6 these things get an issue, and the 76/300 has a aperture ratio of f/4 (focal length devided byaperture), making it harder to collimate too.

Overall the 76/900 would be the better choice, though sells for more then any of the 76/300, but still comes with a weak tripod & mount.

And the 76/300 does however fit into a backpack easily and the dobsonian mount is very stable. So they all have their up and downs, really.

I just tried it yesterday with the Kellner-Eyepieces. Even with 4mm eyepiece Saturn is tiny, the rings visible but just as small "ears".

With more expensive eyepieces and higher magnification it's better.

I don't understand why the brand name 76/300 only come with 10 and 20mm eyepieces, even with a barlow planets are still tiny.