Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

I own an Orion SkyScanner 100 and I'm thinking about getting a Barlow. Initially I thought about an Orion Tri-Mag 1.25" 3x but I don't know it will perform with my telescope. I need your advice, will a 3x be ok?a 2x? Or do you have a different option?

Thank you,

Gabrielle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your current eyepieces will give you a magnification of 20x and 40x in that case, and as the maximum magnification of a 100mm aperture scope would generally be suggested as around 200x there's no reason not to try a barlow. If you tried a 2x barlow then you'd probably gain little from using it with the 20mm eyepiece unless that is better quality than the 10mm, so perhaps a 2.5x would be better, giving you magnifications of 50x and 100x. You could try a 3x barlow, but I'd worry that the small aperture might mean the image isn't bright enough. I don't know that there are very many 3x barlows around and they may not be very cheap.

An alternative would be to look for some shorter focal length eyepieces, but in an f/4 scope you're really going to need good quality ones.

James

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a newbie at this. Right now, I'm interested in palentary viewing until I train my eyes for deep skies. I thought about getting this first and then another piece next month more suitable for deep skies. Now I'm really confused.

The Orion Tri-Mag 1.25" 3x Barlow Lens is only $58 dollars. The description says ''Perfect for extracting higher powers from short-focal-length telescopes''.

Am I being too naive?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.