Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Watec Video image of Mars (and "interlacing")


Macavity

Recommended Posts

Since I could see *some* surface features on Mars last night, in real time, on the Watec, I decided to try stacking the best 500/1000 frames (in Registax) to see what would happen! The scope setup was my MAK150, plus 2" & 1.25" Barlows, or ~4x multiplication (~f/48, f=7200mm)... At least the Watec rarely suffers from a lack of light? <G> So, a first ever Martian image (enlarged 2x):

Mars.jpg

The dark rim of Mars seems to have been a bit "eroded" (LOL), perhaps due to miss-setting of camera gain and / or Registax over-processing? (Obviously) no auto-guiding, just a straight HEQ5, whirring away for 1000x 25 fps. Focussing is probably a bit sus too! But overall, I'm pleasantly surprised - "One up" on previous attempts with budget "solar system" cameras... :o

Aside: Perhaps of more general interest, I discovered that the image is much improved, and stacking facilitated, by setting the "interlacing" to smooth (rather than the default "Off"!) - In the <camera settings> of the (Gstar4) capture software??? I had thought that Video Cams (the Watec) were "progressive scan", but seemingly it's "2:1 interlaced"? Either way, fiddling with this setting seemed to make the image MUCH less "rastery" and smooths the edges of Mars, Sunspots... probably stars too? :blob10:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice surface detail but why is the edge of the disc so bumpy?
I think, what happens, Mike, is that the LIMB of Mars is quite dark. If I don't set the "gain" of the Watec exactly right, at the INPUT level, the dark bits get "lost" in the background sky! The "intelligence" of Registax is (genuinely) amazing, but I sense it can "run amok" or be "overdriven" re. Wavelets etc. I have a fair bit to learn... :blob10:

It seems the hardest thing (with the Watec, anyway) is the "knob twiddling" - Despite the, very convenient, control box. As ever, what I need to do is WRITE things down more... Read a bit more, too. Planetary imaging is, I sense, fairly well documented. Read more too... :o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.