Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

Messing around with the F2.8 newtonian


Catanonia

Recommended Posts

Nice clear night tonight , low moon and crystal clear.

I am still having fun / learning the newtonion F2.8, my 1st ever newtonian ( sucker for punnishment eh :D), but tonight I wanted to put aside the problems and go for some imaging for a change even though the setup is far from perfect.

Issues I still have are focus problems in various parts of the image, collimation, tilt and my polar alignment is way off.

M33 was a nice target, high up early on, so left it imaging at F2.8 for 3 min LRGB subs whilst I took the wifey out for a birthday dinner in town.

Ended up with 15 x 3 min subs or 3 hours of LRGB when we got back. A quick process and , mmmmm, something special about this scope or I am doing something majory wrong.

The 1st image was my best effort with the SkyWatcher MN190 @ F5.3 Astrograph of 16 hours on M33. If I remember it was 8 minute subs for this image for LRGB

M33%2016Hours%20LRGB%20MN190.jpg

That was 16 hours at 1000mm Focal Length

So here is 3 hours in 3 minute subs for LRGB (15 each) with the SuperNewt F2.8 @ 570mm focal length. A quick 30 mins processing, so not precise or too careful. Flats. Bias and Darks have been applied and each layer was DBE gradient processed individually before combining.

M33%20stretched%20-%20SuperNewt.jpg

Yes just 3 hours in 3 min subs. Loads of star issues with collimation I am aware about, just wanted to image something for a change instead of messing, but I am outstanded with the results.

No matter how much I check, this scope just picks up the MilkyWay dust in the images. It is all over the place. So much so I have to keep checking my flats and processing to make sure I am not messing up, but these dust lanes are all over all of my images.

I just have to learn how to process the things :):D:D

If I ever get this scope aligned, collimated and set up right, wow I will be amazed.

Something keeps telling me though, this is processing / flat error, but on the Bodes galaxies, the patterns fit the integrated flux images on google to a tee. So I am forcing myself to believe the image you see is actually what is there, dust clouds.

Thoughts ? searching google images for M33 doesn't show anything like this, but then again they are heavily processed and any trace would have been removed.

EDIT : The image is stretched a wee bit too much for my liking, but I wanted to show the dust lanes and still keep M33 fairly sharp. Obviously some adjustment on the levels would reduce them, but they will not go away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a beast of a scope! I am really impressed by the colours, framing etc. As you say maybe a bit heavy on the editing side but a fantastic setup! You have a few interesting lines cutting across the image, could they be sat trails? How do you stack?

Annoyingly good anyways!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a beast of a scope! I am really impressed by the colours, framing etc. As you say maybe a bit heavy on the editing side but a fantastic setup! You have a few interesting lines cutting across the image, could they be sat trails? How do you stack?

Annoyingly good anyways!

thanks, yes rough processing and a bit on the heavy side. The lines are indeed sat trails. I am going to image again tomorrow for another 3 hours and then do a proper process.

It is a beast of a scope, also a beast to collimate and setup, but it is fun messing, honest :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh my God! Best m33 i ever seen!

thanks mate, redoing exactly the same again as the collimation was awful in this image and the polar alignment was massively off giving rubish guiding. Also I have sort out the tilt.

Looking much better this time as the subs come in :)

Grabbing another 3 hours worth and compare against this post before M78 rises for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.