Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Anyone used the Samsung 2.8-10mm under the stars?


Ben Ritchie

Recommended Posts

Not much to add to the title really, but i'm wondering about using the SCB-2000P as a widefield 'finder' - one option is to pick up a C mount to M42 lens adapter and then search ebay for a cheap M42 lens, but I was wondering about how the 2.8-10mm Samsung lens might do. Would be looking for reasonably distortion-free stars across the FOV, although don't expect miracles for the price.

Anyone tried it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which 10-40mm did you get?

I'm looking something that'll show constellation-sized widefields, the idea was that I could piggyback it and then put some kind of marking on the screen to show the telescope FOV. Picked the Samsung one just because it was listed on buythis in conjunction with the -2000P.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks to Peter kindly lending me one, I can say that ... it appears remarkably good.

Conditions aren't great for a detailed test, being not fully dark and with cloud now blowing through, but I set the Samsung up on a camera tripod for a play anyway. Fully zoomed in looks like stars may suffer a bit, i'm not sure yet, but when dialled out slightly it gave a sharp field of view from Delphinus to the 'bowl' asterism between lambda Aql and beta Scu which stellarium estimates at about 30 degrees. So, not for picking out faint fuzzies and tiny planetary nebulae, but with stacking set to 128x it gave a very nice sharp starfield down to around 8th magnitude which is brilliant for pointing out constellations - things like Sagitta that are easy naked-eye asterisms once you know where too look but rather hard to point out to a beginner really stand out well on the screen. Another bonus is that 128x and 256x modes are great at making satellites stand out, as they slowly blur across the screen in front of a sharp starfield.

So initial impressions are very positive, and a useful and interesting tool too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.