Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

Celestron 127 test


malc-c

Recommended Posts

Pretty nice :)

How do you rate it against the 200p for planetary/lunar? I'm pushed for space and need to travel to my site, so the smaller mak is really attractive, but i don't wanna sacrifice too much in the way of observing power, since at a push, i could cram the 200p into the car.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be honest the 200P provides a brighter image, obviously having 3" inches in aperture and being F5. But the 127 is an excellent performer, especially visually, giving excellent results when used with decent eyepieces

That said, here's a comparison of the moon with the same camera through the 200P

post-23388-133877675304_thumb.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.