Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

patraip1

Members
  • Posts

    32
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by patraip1

  1. ok here goes my setup

    I have a Nikon D5500. I bought it 2nd hand. I tried to find a dslr with as little weight as possible and the D5500 has an awesome sensor for AP!!! Extremely low noise and isoless. The only negative it has is that it does not capture red Ha very well. 

    I removed the camera stock lens and have attached these two items on the camera body

    Screenshot_2021-12-16-09-56-20-601_com.banggood.client.thumb.jpg.d273decd77f1321eaf96ce9014f35b03.jpgScreenshot_2021-12-16-09-55-26-045_com.banggood.client.thumb.jpg.2b052a8452a081db8d8cb0e3e0e5072d.jpg

    I simply then slip the camera with the T adapter into the focuser just like any other 1,25" eyepiece... 

    IMG_20211025_130358.thumb.jpg.abbc8d8b9429e94b8da59406e5d9f592.jpg

    the blue cable wires you see is just an extra strengthening step but not really necessay, the focuser handles the weight of my nikon (420gr) easily.... 

    You can also see the brown thin electrical tape (more on that later) 

    IMG_20211025_130349.thumb.jpg.3217780919e85ceaacf697395b2b2ca3.jpg

    A light shroud is absolutely necassary. I also have fabricated a dew shield about 30cm long (from the same black paper I used for the light shroud) which I put in the front end of the OTA just before taking the pictures after I have framed my target and checked my tracking and taken my test frames. This is very important in keeping stray light from nearby sources to a minimum. I also take my flats with the dew/straylight shield on at the end of my imaging session pointing the entire rig to a laptop sceen playing a youtube video named :"24 hours of pure white" from a distance of about 1,5 meters in a completely dark room. Flats taken with a tablet on top the end of the telescope covered with a white t shirt were a huge problem for me at the beggining, because light found its way directky from the secondary to the camera......

    I have the heritage mounted on an Skywatcher AZGTI alt az mount

    IMG_20211025_130505.thumb.jpg.828c65ea702abfd3694e72c1044dd667.jpg

    I also put a counterweight on the bar of 1kg.You can also see the distance that the trusses are retrieved in order to achieve prime focus with my dslr. 

    I have a layer of thin electrical tape in the focuser threads which makes the focuser very hard to screw and unscrew but once I find focus I never have to move the focuser again for many imaging session. I have the focuser almost completely screwd in. (You will have to try moving the trusses inwards while focusing on a star) The shorter the length of the telescope the shorter the F becomes, so you can capture more light!! When I had the trusses adjusted I was just shy of perfect focus. I then used 1/8 to 1/4 of a turn of the focuset to achieve perfect focus. It was actually very easy. Just make sure the focuser threads are covered with the tape and it is very very tight, because otherwise it is very easy to lose focus if the camera twists even a little and twists the focuser along with it. Screw the 2 screws that hold the tring adapter to the focuser evenly. If you want a different frame rotate just the camera! The focuser must be tight!! 

    I focus on Jupiters moons with the camera in live view and maximum zoom until I see the smaller possible moons. I asked a friend with a 3d printer to make me a bahtinov mask which I found in this link

    https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:2493073

    I have only used it once since it comfirmed my already focused camera was spot on!

    Cheers and clear skies!!

     

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
  2. well there have been occasional clear nights.... Unfortunately the old data from m42 are in another laptop to which I currently do not have access. Do you think iso 400 or iso 200 looks better? I still have not decided what my goto ISO will be. I think 400 brings out nebulosity better even if slightly, but is bloating the stars a little.... 

    Opinions are very much welcome! 

  3. some more pictures I took 2 nights ago together with the flame and horsehead nebula.... 

    180 frames of NGC 891 and 87 from an older session for a total of 267 subs of 15sec, flats and bias DSS ST Snapseed taken with my heritage 130p and Nikon D5500 on a azgti mount

    SAVE_20211205_211842.thumb.jpg.ec72f7e58eef191a4d7b556b1b9375ab.jpg

     

    180 light frames 15 sec of M42. same setup as above (before my tracking issues) 

    SAVE_20211205_211712.thumb.jpg.759998ee1ee915bddace4f624691492e.jpg

    and here is my previous attempt at m42 @iso200 100subs of 15sec for comparison

    SAVE_20211030_191542.thumb.jpg.430ae753bf597640474511b0c9d5033c.jpg

     

    • Like 3
  4. As the clouds are up I am restacking old data. Here is a mix of ISO200 and 400, exposure times and even 200 subs of M31 setting (180 rotated with regard to the rest!!!), total subs 562 , total integration time 1:45, corresponding flats and biases. 

    Stacked in groups in DSS with average mode and all the rest of the settings as per startools. 

    Heavy crop and process in Startoolsm31threegroups.thumb.jpeg.ca8118a438a3002048154102c7d48331.jpeg

    • Like 1
  5. I stacked all the available data on M33 in groups. I had subs at ISO 400 13sec,ISO 400 10sec,ISO 200 10sec and ISO 200 15 sec. I threw everything in DSS in groups (the main group with one (1) completely irrelavant frame unchecked plus 4 other groups) with their corresponding flats and biases, chose one frame as reference and then did an average stack of 1182 frames. 46 hours later and processed in Startools and snapseed....... 

    M33ALL_2-01.thumb.jpeg.b052425962b1e303913648d626265531.jpeg

    • Like 3
  6. I managed to capture more subs of M33. I added to the 197 for a total of 407 10sec light frames, together with 36 flats and 36 bias frames (skipped adding the dark flats as my flats where 1/200 sec as an experiment...) 

    Stacked in DSS with no white balance and black point set to 0 in the raw settings and no RGB background color calibration in the lights tab in stacking settings (as instructed per Startools site). 

    Processed in Starools 

    Bare in mind that the moon was almost full and at 60 degrees from the target for half the lights and 45 for the rest on two different nights which produced a massive light gradient in my stacked picture which startools handled quite well with an agressive wipe.  

    m33SECONDATTEMPT.thumb.JPEG.e5ded1f8e429ac7649f44ede9926e00c.JPEG

    and here is the same with some touches in Snapseed

    m33SECONDATTEMPT-01.thumb.jpeg.a617e4017d6eecc030f17512a801afcf.jpeg

     

     

    I will try again next week without the moon (clouds permitting....) 

    • Like 4
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.