Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

GreyArea10

New Members
  • Posts

    2
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by GreyArea10

  1. Hi all I'm new here and after many years of threatening to buy but being put off by cost, I have a rather large birthday coming up and my particularly excellent wife has suggested that now is the time to purchase a scope. We have 3 months so hopefully there is is plenty of time to overcome the current shortages however whilst I have my own opinions on where I might land as regards a scope I thought I'd ask the usual beginners question but in a slightly different way. I guess that this is driven by my other hobby of playing the guitar where on guitar forums there is a groupthink answer to every beginner question (Squier classic vibe and katana amp for those that are interested) which whilst it's a good guitar it's by no means the best and isn't the right answer for everyone. I have noticed a similar although not quite as obvious trend in the threads here where beginners ask and a 200 Dob seems to be the default answer. And so to my question, what scopes would you recommend to a beginner if they were looking to spend £500, £1000, £2000 or £2500? If, and I guess that this is probably a fairly usual position for beginners, solar system visual is the initial starting point but a scope that will cope with DSO visual and possible be okay as a route into imaging it that became of interest in the future. I am well aware that one scope won't do all so the best compromise is what I'm after. The other factor to take into account is that I live in a Bortle 6 area and whilst my back garden is reasonably shielded it's still a city back garden and so transportability to a dark site that is 20-30 minutes from home is probably an necessity. Thanks in advance for your suggestions.
  2. Sorry for hijacking this a little, I’m new and trying to identify which telescope to go for and had landed on these two as well. I suppose it’s driven by trying to find a scope that is as close to an allrounder as possible. I see everyone here saying no for imaging for these two however they both state faststar as reducing the focal length and f number, why are people disregarding this? I assume there’s a reason I’m not aware of?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.