Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

MattG

Members
  • Posts

    30
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by MattG

  1. 1 hour ago, Epick Crom said:

    Thanks Jiggy 68, yes we are lucky to have such incredible sky objects here in Oz. But I reckon you northerners have it great too, Andromeda galaxy, Polaris, Perseus, Auriga, Ursa Major etc. It's always been my dream in Astronomy to view the sky from the northern hemisphere, what a strange view it would be!

    I live in the UK and with the weather I feel like I haven't viewed the sky from the northern hemisphere either recently... What a strange view it will be to have clear skies 😂

  2. I think I've got to just order and then play the long waiting game. If I upgrade the shoe and RACI, is there particular RACIs that people would recommend? Looking at FLO there's a huge difference in price between the Astro Essentials for £59 and the Explore Scientific for £189, is it really necessary to pay that much for a RACI?

    Thanks,

    Matt

  3. 9 minutes ago, wulfrun said:

    The only problem you have there that's worth pointing out is the Hyperflex. Zooms have a narrower field of view at the longer end of their range (21.5mm end). I'd suggest a longish fixed-FL to get around that, maybe not immediately but you may find the zoom's limitation annoying. A planisphere is useful too and a red torch, neither is expensive but not sure if you can stretch the budget?

    FL? Sorry but if I'm dense!

  4. Hi,

    With how long it's likely to be to wait I'm going to just bite the bullet and just order a telescope. I've spent a while lurking and reading the forum trying to work out what I want (not easy!) and have (probably) decided on an 8" Newtonian. I'm currently considering:

    Skywatcher 200p dobsonian

    Bresser 8" messier

    Skywatcher explorer 200p EQ5

    From what I understand using the EQ5 mount rather than the dobsonian can lead to some awkward viewing angles. 

    Is there much difference between the SW and Bresser dobs? Am I right in thinking that the bresser mount is a bit better? 

    Essentially, if you had to pick one of the dobs, which would you go for and why?

    I'm an almost complete beginner. I've been out with a cheap telescope a few times, mostly just viewing the moon. At this point I'm only really interested in observing though would love to get some basic snaps, either on my phone or by attaching my partner's DSLR. I understand that the pictures I'm likely to get are not going to be world beaters, don't worry. I would initially want to be able to see Jupiter and Saturn though would like to be able to see DSOs. At this point I've only ever really viewed the moon. I suspect seeing Jupiter and Saturn would blow my mind though people on here seem to be also blown away by DSOs like pleiades. If I'm right I am hoping that these telescopes would be a great intro to these.

    Thanks very much, everybody on here seems to have an infinite amount of patience for these type of questions!

     

    Matt

     

  5. Hi FLO,

    Out of interest have any of the manufacturers said when they expect the situation to normalise? I know everythings messed up with both manufacturing and shipping at the moment but I was just interested if anybody had given any expected dates for normality? Also, I'm not expecting you to predict the future or necessarily be able to answer this concretely, "no" and "I have no idea" are both perfectly acceptable responses! 🤣

    Had my eye on either a Bresser 8" or a SW 200 for a month or so now, can't wait to get one!

    Matt

  6. Thanks Pixies and wimvb. I live in a house that is in a Bortle rating of 5 but quite close to areas of 4 and even 3 would only be a ten minute drive away. I was trying to guage last night how mad the light pollution is right outside my house and I don't think it's too bad. I have an east facing back garden and I think I could possibly use that to see some things (possible with some sort of hood). I think I will just have to experiment and see what works best. You're definitely right that a telescope I use is the best one.

    I'm leaning more and more to either the 200P or the 250P without GoTo. I think either would let me see both planets and some DSOs (?) which would be incredible. From reading around I appreciate I'm not going to be seeing images like can be seen in photos but still, being able to differentiate Saturns rings or even the red spot would be amazing.

    • Like 1
  7. Thanks everybody for the responses. I think the 6SE is a bit out of my price range, not sure how impressed my other half would be if I dropped £1,000 on a telescope when we're about to have our first baby 🤣 I think I can probably strech the £500 budget to £800 but £1,000 seems a bit far.

    The complete lack of supply at the moment I think is actually going to work in my favour as it will mean I spend more time researching before buying. On the flip side, the weather is killing me at the moment, I haven't seen a star for aaaaages!

    I'm starting to doubt whether having a go-to is a priority or not. It looks like it adds a fair chunk to the cost of the telescope which I wonder if I would be better off putting into getting a bigger aperture? Any thoughts? It would also force me to learn the night sky a bit more. This would obviously be a good thing in the long run but I do wonder how much progress I will make if I can only go out a few nights a month (and probably only over winter). Would the quick wins of a go-to (assuming I can align it properly which I won't know until I've bought it...) actually mean I get more from this new hobby? Difficult to know!

    I do think portability has to be a big consideration which I guess is the offset to having a better telescope. I live in a small town and I don't think I will be able to see much from my garden, I will need to be able to move things down to the park. Everything I read says that I will get more performance from a Dob but I do worry about the portability, I guess the flextube of the recommendation by wimvb would help with that. With that, it's f/6, does that mean it's a good compromise that would allow me to view both planets and some DSOs? Also, I can't seem to find the weight of it, anybody own one and able to estimate?

    Long story short - at this point I'm still torn between the Meade ETX90, the Celestron NexStar 4SE and now the Sky-Watcher Skyliner 200P Flextube....

    Matt

  8. Hi JOC,

    I am looking at getting the same telescope - how have you found using it over the last couple of years? What sort of objects have you managed to see? Did you ever get your DSLR attached? Also, how portable is it? Are you able to lift and move it on your own? I'm a reasonably fit and healthy 32yo but would possibly need to carry it a few 100m at a time, do you think that would be possible? 

    Thanks!

    Matt

  9. Thanks for the recommendations wimvb. Is there any particular reason you would suggest those (in particular the top one) over the ones I was looking at? With that one, how rugged is it? It looks quite big and I'm concerned that if I'm carrying it around it's going to get bumped about a bit. Do you know if you can get a decent carry case for it to a) help protect it and b) make it easier to move?

    Also, is that first one not f6? I thought that for planetary viewing a slower focal ratio was better? Or is f6 a good compromise that would also allow some DSO viewing?

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.