Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

GeneralT001

New Members
  • Posts

    2
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

1 Neutral

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Size for the Nexdome is manageable for my 12.5 scope (barely) - its the shutter that is the real weak point of the Nexdome automation setup, There is too much friction with the shutter going up and down. All owners have to use a combination of teflon tape and wax paste to keep the friction low enough that it will open without stalling. But this "maintenance" is required often - maybe every few weeks. As well, the shutter sometimes just stops 1/2 way up or down due to controller issues(?), with no way to fix that without physically going to the observatory and resetting the Arduino. As well, the dome automation track will sometimes skip a tooth or two which throws the calibration askew. Needless to say, not an ideal situation if you want reliable remote observing. The Pulsar sounds very solid in those respects.
  2. Tried asking this on CNs but I don't think there are too many of these over in the US/Canada. Can anyone provide feedback on the quality of the Pulsar Domes? I'm seriously considering getting one of the 2.7m models. Anyone know if they play well with Voyager and SGP? I'm been told that they are ASCOM compatible so shouldn't be an issue? I currently have a Nexdome which I plan on switching for a Pulsar. Thanks
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.