-
Posts
108 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Nair al Saif
-
-
Wow those are very impressive pictures. You took those on the astromaster Mount as well which isn’t the Celestron equivalent to the eq3-2. I think that this is the best route for me! Great shot of Jupiter!
-
-
What’s everyone’s opinion about a 4inch frac on the eq mount? 102/1000 Bresser
Would this be good for visual and photography?
btw I’m looking for visual first, then upgrading to photography once I get a good camera.
-
Ohh!
I should get a light but large telescope. I think the cc is to heavy and a bit out of my price range. I could always check used tho.
if that’s the case I think imaging with the maksutov 127 will be far better than imaging/observing on a large 127L refractor!
-
Would that work on an eq3-2 Mount?
Also doesn’t an cc suffer from spherical aberration and coma?
-
What is a cc6 and what are it’s advantages over maksutov and act and refractor design?
-
Planets definitely! Not so much dso
-
I think a 5inch mak on an eq3-2 is a very good idea but a Bresser AR127L on an eq5 (skywatcher) Mount. Would love some advice ! Max budget 400 pounds
(ps: sorry if you have seen my earlier posts if so pls forget this post! )
-
Zhumell 12x70 or Celestron 20x80? Final contestants. Is high magnification good for dso or does it balance out for the Celestron
-
Yes that is true. Is there any difference between Celestron 20x80 and opticorp 20x80
-
15x70 or 20x80 or 25x70
I have a camera tripod mount but holding it in my hands is also nice
Zhumell 12x70 is also an option
-
Now which to buy first!
haha thanks again
The 5 part series has come to an end thanks to all!
-
3 minutes ago, Robindonne said:
So you’re going for the mak?😅
Oh no the 127 mak is to expensive it’s the refractor!
-
Thank you to all!
Nothing beats the 8 inch dob! Is it really that good for that price! I think a runner up would be the evostar 120.
-
3 hours ago, igorigs said:
Own only the Evostar 90, watched through 8'' Dob, can say for Evo that for beginner scope it's amazing. Easy to use, lightweight and cheap.
Was there a massive differences with the 8 inch dob stuff you saw?
-
2 minutes ago, johninderby said:
A 150mm newt on a Skytee II would work well and with the slo-mo controls easier to track with. Bit more than a dob but still not too expensive.
Hmm
-
Forget the dobsonian (for now) who would win?
-
What is an alternative to a dobsonian? (Trying to get the full acale). What is the worst on the list as well?
Please rank them
-
Transporting to my back garden!
Storage is good as well
-
What would be the runner up (the dob has won) but what next?
-
Mak102 is on now sorry(non-collimatable) tho
-
Ye, tbh I’m just afraid of buying a dob cause nudging.
-
So here is a list of contestants.
Astromaster 130eq 100 Facebook marketplace
Skywatcher 6 inch dobsonian 219 New
(Maybe skywatcher 8 inch) 289 new
Skywatcher 90 evostar 155 new
Skywatcher 102starquest mak
(maybe 102/120 evostar refractors)
I need honest opinions. May the best win. Planetary 80:20 dso
-
I’m back, I have already seen your review it’s pretty wholesome. The 90mm gets crushed by the 8 inch every time but tracking is an issue with the dob. 300x times mag seems difficult to track with. I am not good with diy so can’t make an eq base. I’m not spending 300 pounds plus on a suitable tripod with an eq head on it. I just don’t know. Anyway I have made my decision it’s too late for me to get a telescope.
I am looking for a good telescope for both visual and photography.
in Discussions - Scopes / Whole setups
Posted
Personally, I think the mak fits perfectly for what I need. I don’t care much about dso (have Binos) but I would love to do some planetary imaging and observing!