Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

Gary Clayton

Members
  • Posts

    165
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Gary Clayton

  1. That's the 3D model, just turn it of in the options tab and it will display the easier to view 2D version, it's showing that your back focus needs tweaking a bit, try to get the curvature radius number as large as possible.

  2. 5 minutes ago, SAW said:

    I have some tilt shims which side do I need to put the raised part on ? How much should I reduce my spacing each time to notice any changes ?

    It's impossible for me to say as I don't have access to your rig, it's going to be trial and error on your part. Does you camera have a tilt adapter ?, if so your need to work out which side is which as well as it's top and bottom, if your using a ZWO camera my understanding is that the bump in the camera's body is the top, have a look at these videos to get you started.  https://www.asgastronomy.com/collimation-tilt-and-backfocus/

  3. 51 minutes ago, Anthonyexmouth said:

    What's the best bang for buck dual NB filter at the moment? preferably one with minimal halo issues. 

    Difficult one this, I started off with the Optolong L-eXtreme and was mostly pleased with it apart from the halo issue which seemed particular bad so I ended buying the Antlia ALP-T "Gold" dual band 5nm filter and have not looked back, this was before the new L-Ultimate came out though. I am not sure that there is a cheap option if halo's are an issue for you.

  4. 10 minutes ago, SAW said:

    This quite clearly shows both your tilt (32%) and your Off-axis aberration (back focus error) as being high, try to get this in the 0.20 mark, I would start on the tilt first by shooting a starfield that has no nebula or clusters in it at around 30 second mark.

    • Like 1
  5. 9 minutes ago, SAW said:

    Would that cause the stars to look like crosses if it's too close ?

    If your to close to the reducer you get radial shaped stars pointing to the centre of the image as per the top image and cross shaped/diagonal stars if your to far away from your reducer as per the lower image, so in your case you seem to be to far away from your reducer but also have some camera/focuser tilt.

    • Like 1
  6. 42 minutes ago, SAW said:

    I was using my 2600MM last night on the 90mm for the first time, normally use the 183MM without any problems. What is causing the really bad star shapes all along the bottom ? Can I fix it or do the optics need collimating ?

    integration.jpg

    If you look at the bottom corners you have cross shaped stars indicating that your sensor is to far away from the reducer as well as having some tilt as the top ones are not as bad 

    • Like 1
  7. There is very little difference if any as far as picture quality goes and this is to be expected considering that they both use the same sensor, the AA 26C seems to be a bit more finicky regarding it's USB port preferring USB 3 over USB2 but apart from that you can't go wrong with either camera, it depends if your stuck with the ASIair ecosystem or not.

    • Like 1
  8. Messier 81 and Messier 82 about 12 million light-years away in the constellation Ursa Major, taken over the last two nights from my back garden and hindered by the Moon!.
    159 X 5 minute subs, so just over 13 hours total intergartion time
    Stacked and drizzled in Astro Pixel Processor then finished in PixInsight
    StellaMira 90 with 0.8 reducer/flattener
    IDAS D1 Light Pollution Suppression Filter
    Altair Astro Hypercam 26C Camera
    Ioptron CEM40G equatorial mount

    M81_Annotated.jpg

    • Like 11
  9. I have also just spent some time adjusting the tilt on my setup which comes from my camera, and it's a learning curve trying to figure out which origination the camera is in relation to the tilt adapter screws, but in the end I managed to get it reasonable low as not to be to objectionable once the image is cropped out.

    Don't expect perfectly round stars in all the corners with an APS-C size sensor though.

    ST90.png

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.