Jump to content

sgl_imaging_challenge_2021_annual.thumb.jpg.3fc34f695a81b16210333189a3162ac7.jpg

JamesAstro2002

Members
  • Content Count

    55
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

8 Neutral

About JamesAstro2002

  • Rank
    Nebula

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Hi, Recently I've been able to get out under the stars and test my new Altair 102 triplet - however, I've noticed some odd star elongation and it's really got me stumped as to what's causing it. https://drive.google.com/open?id=1rze_Lwnlm4LBiV2mer5gnLEQ2pKaRain This was the first test frame I was able to gather a couple nights ago. As you can see the stars are evenly stretched across the frame, going in the same direction. https://drive.google.com/open?id=1BAE7u88qT0PBkm2jBS1atBiV8WVMftx9 This was the first frame I got from last night, and the stars looked a lot bet
  2. Hi, I've been messing around trying to get the spacing correct between my TS photoline 0.79x corrector and 1600mm, now that it's better I have noticed some tilt. It seems the stars are good in the top left corner and the central part of the frame, but all the other corners not so much. How does one go about adjusting tilt? I've also attached my imaging train - I'm using some push fit adapters, could that be causing it? Or do I just need to adjust the spacing very slightly to negate the tilt? And yes I have a dovetail bar zip tied onto the finderscope bracket, don't judge me it was fo
  3. The second set of screws, closest to the end of the tube.
  4. Yeah, I was quite suprised at how large they are! I managed to get hold of William Optics and they instructed me to loosen the lens cell screws by an 1/8 turn. I did so and tested it last night, seems to have sorted it I think! The conditions were terrible, so only managed to grab some quick tests before it clouded completely.
  5. http://www.opticstar.com/Run/Astronomy/Astro-Telescopes-Ascension.asp?p=0_10_1_6_30 Hi all, I found a good looking deal for one of these telescopes second hand. Was just wondering if anyone has had any experience with them or know about them. Cheers, James.
  6. Okay, thanks - that makes sense. Yes, I have a dew heater on at all times and always see these effects.
  7. Hi all, Apologies if this has been asked before, but I've come to notice these odd artifacts on stars with the William Optics Z73. It almost looks like something's protruding into the light path? Come to think of it, the stars do look rather bloated and quite large - is this just inherent being that it's a doublet? This was my first hack at LRGB. Cheers, James.
  8. Great, thank you both. I am leaning towards the baader, but of course SW is still an option. And thank you for the offer @Spaced Out - I'm sure I'll ask more questions if I buy it, lol.
  9. Cool. As @Stub Mandrel just said I probably will just have to buy a CC again, I've realised just how bad the coma is without one. Did you require any extra spacers to get the right backfocus? Would you mind sending a picture of it?
  10. Awesome! Thanks for the reply. What Coma Corrector do you use out of question?
  11. Hi all, I've been thinking about cracking my 130pds out again for imaging with my asi 1600mm. Any other users of the 1600mm and this scope? And would an adapter like this be okay for connecting the cam? I want to test the scope out before purchasing a CC again. https://www.firstlightoptics.com/adapters/astro-essentials-2-inch-t-mount-camera-nosepiece-adapter.html
  12. I never thought about filter sizes, thanks for bringing that up. I also came across the QHY 163m variant. Does this have the same, larger backfocus requirement?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.