Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.



New Members
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About davezap

  • Rank
  1. Yes it's motorized. I see concrete pouring in my future. The guy was also getting rid of a rack full of equipment so I scored a 9kHz to 22 GHz spectrum analyser (second hand probably worth what I paid for the dish), GPS disciplined reference, RF Switch / controllers, a down converter of some description, various network switches, and a couple of Custom PCs to run it all. So far a good deal I think, now I just need to remove the dish, now that is going to be an exercise!
  2. Hi again, went and had a look and pending some money changing hands it's a done deal.. OH dear god what have I done? The primary reflector is actually 4.6m (not 4.8 as advertised), although I'm not complaining. The depth is 0.85m giving a focal point at 155cm where we find a concave (hence my thought it was a gregorian) secondary reflector, f/D=0.34. So at the target frequency of 1420MHz it's 20 wave lengths wide. Then if we take a punt on efficiency at 70% (although I have no idea) the overall gain would be about 35dB and that would be most welcome. The secondary itself is 550mm wide and 220mm deep and has been designed specifically for this dish so I'm assuming it's perfect. I realize this has gone terribly off topic.
  3. I'll go and have a look at it tomorrow. From my basic understanding its a gregorian style dish. From the description 'tracking satellites' I'm going to guess it's setup for 4GHz+ but have little to base that on. I suppose I will be ripping out the feed and replacing it with my own one. Having said that 4.8m is huge and I can't imagine my neighbors will be much pleased with me pulling it apart, moving and setting up again looks like a big undertaking.
  4. I guess as a beginner either are fine and many are getting results with cheaper SDRs ( like the two of you ) . I might take a punt on the RSP1A. But how about this dish that is selling local to me! It's quite a beast. But where to put it, that's the question. https://trademe.nz/marketplace/business-farming-industry/other/listing/2149700381
  5. Hi all, first post here. I came across this forum while doing some research around hydrogen line observations. I am also quite interested in it and have read the 8 page topic on this board with interest. My background is in electronics so think I can assemble the RF chain. While I am not an RF expert I won't be putting a metal pole up the can What I am really interested in is what SDR are people here using. I guess I mean in terms of the secondary software for doing FFT averaging should I pick one SDR over another based around it's support / drivers / API and so on? I see lots of mentions everywhere for the RTL-SDR gear, but lets say I was willing to spend a little more money what do you think I should look at? At this point in time I am kind of sitting between a SDR Play RSP1A or an AIRSPY R2. I am leaning more towards the RSP1A due to it's lower range (not that I need that for H-Line but perhaps for other things later) and 14bit ADC (vs 12bit on the AirSpy) and TCXO. Love to hear your thoughts and experiences with some of these 'mid-range' radios, bad experiences and all. Thanks Dave
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.