Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

R3tr0

Members
  • Posts

    33
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by R3tr0

  1. On 17/06/2019 at 14:02, symmetal said:

    Hi R3tr0,

    Your replacement is certainly an improvement. There is still slight coma in the corners but whether that would bother you in real images where stacking would likely make it less noticeable only you can say.

    Alan

    Yeah it produces better images from my original, I'm ok with this version, I will post some images weather dependent.

  2. Hi 

    An update on my situation the Redcat has been tested and replaced by a tested version from Rother Vally Optics (thanks for there help, very good lads) I got out last night and did a few test shots. No editing except to save out as tff and crop out the cls filter on the "Med Exp" (this was taken in full frame mode, others were in APSC mode).

    Test Recat 01 (Short Exp).tif Test Recat 03 (Med Exp).tif Test Recat 02 (Long Exp).tif

  3. 3 minutes ago, FLO said:

    We have just received another delivery of RedCat telescopes (WhiteCats too) so if someone has a problem with theirs please contact us, assuming of course it was purchased from FLO 🙂 

    Currently we have experienced only three that required attention (the majority are performing well and customers are pleased) but if over time we conclude RedCats require additional quality control we will arrange that (sell them with Es' Reid checks). 

    HTH, 

    Steve 

    Thanks for the heads up FLO, got mine from RVO I have informed them and awaiting a call back.

  4. 11 hours ago, Jkulin said:

    I just had a look and whilst the centres were reasonable this is from the Top left, horrendous star shapes: -

    image.thumb.png.73ca42d1569aa14eb055254cd7be33e0.png

    Bottom Left: -

    image.thumb.png.4947bfca0204f4053e27cac48e0db311.png

    Bottom Right

    image.thumb.png.c818e58c78f55b749e82d59b2b8c1b24.png

    Top Right

    image.thumb.png.7b7cd0bfd55d2b95be79ed0df19caedc.png

    Middle

    image.thumb.png.eb85d391b2f29c11d533702f2066ecec.png

    Sorry Scott, but I really think you have got a real problem with that OTA and I woudln't waste any more time with it.

    I will most definitely not be buying one until I see some consistency with the quality

    Hay no need for a sorry John< i'll see if they will take it back maybe exchange for something else, I appreciate the info from all on SL.

  5. @Jkulin - A heads up to anyone using a Sony Alpha camera and the Redcat 51 (I'm using the Sony Alpha A7R3) the train I purchased wont work, it is a little long.

    - M48 Female to T2 Male Adaptor 6mm Optical Length

     - T-Mount for Sony Alpha

    I have the official sony alpha adapter from WO now and that is perfect for the job - https://williamoptics.com/48mm-t-mount-for-sony-e-red

     

     

  6. 16 minutes ago, FLO said:

    I confess I am not sure. I use a Canon DSLR, as do my colleagues. 

    We stock an Astro Essential M48 to Sony Alpha / A and a William Optics William Optics DSLR-M48 to Sony NEX. I am guessing your camera requires the former but I don't now. 

    Jkulin appears to know Sony so perhaps he will confirm? 

    HTH, 

    Steve 

    I have asked William Yang for his advice on this, I do know WO are developing a single unit for the Sony Alpha full frames to adapt the Redcat to but its still in development phase!

  7. On 17/04/2019 at 12:04, FLO said:

    I confess I am not sure. I use a Canon DSLR, as do my colleagues. 

    We stock an Astro Essential M48 to Sony Alpha / A and a William Optics William Optics DSLR-M48 to Sony NEX. I am guessing your camera requires the former but I don't now. 

    Jkulin appears to know Sony so perhaps he will confirm? 

    HTH, 

    Steve 

    Just found this - 

    https://sonyreconsidered.com/sony-a-mount-vs-e-mount-bc14739d5473

    "While NEX, FE, and E mount lenses are all made to fit interchangeably, the A mount is not compatible into that system without an adapter."

    So I think both would be needed?

  8. 3 minutes ago, FLO said:

     

    Please don’t be concerned about posting a link. If a competitor has a useful adapter that is not already listed at FLO then we need to know so we can add it to our stock ?

    I am impressed you are speaking with William Yang. I don’t think I have had the pleasure. 

    Steve 

    Ok, thanks here you go for the links -

    https://www.rothervalleyoptics.co.uk/rother-valley-optics-m48-female-to-t2-male-adaptor-6mm-optical-length.html

    https://www.rothervalleyoptics.co.uk/rother-valley-optics-t-mounts.html

     

    With William Yang I basically requested a reaction to comments made about the Redcat 51 on a You Tube channel on the "email us" section of the WO website, I wasn't expecting William to personally answer but he did and we have on going dialogue. A really nice and open guy.

  9. On 17/04/2019 at 09:07, Jkulin said:

    Slightly off topic, but I have just bought the same camera and was interested in the red cat, where did you manage to find a 48mm T adapter and what back focus are you going to work to when the red cat arrives?

    Hi I have on order the following to attach it to the A7R3 -

     - M48 Female to T2 Male Adaptor 6mm Optical Length

     - T-Mount for Sony Alpha

     

    WO are working on production of a single adapter so may get this if the setup i am getting is any way awkward.

    "what back focus are you going to work to when the red cat arrives?" The redcat has about 4" of travel with the helical focus mechanism which is part of the petzval design so there is no issue, with focusing.

     

    EDIT: I did not get these from FLO, but I think they should be able to sort this out for you if you give them a call, I don't want to mention a competitor on there forum.

  10. 4 hours ago, Buzzard75 said:

    He does a lot of talking, but doesn't really say a lot, if you know what I mean. I don't think he fully understands the construction of the RedCat, the differences between it and the original Petzval design (4-element/3-groups vs 4-element/2-groups) or the actual purpose of FPL-53 glass. The design of the RedCat appears to be very similar to Takahashi's and I can't imagine anyone in their right mind would say the same things he's said about them. I don't know what his background is, but I think there's a reason this person only has a fraction of the subscribers and why this video is three weeks old with only a few hundred views. I have a hard time believing he is a professional photographer of any sort because he states someone wouldn't use manual focus with an automatic focusing lens. That is just patently false. He made a few valid points, but the ones he made seemed somewhat petty to me. I honestly wouldn't put a lot faith in anything this person is saying.

     

    Yes, William Yang also mentions the Takahashi FSQ106 and TeleVue 101 are also Petzval designs. WO has tested the redcat with both the Vixen 55SS and Borg 55, with the redcat coming out better.

  11. 6 hours ago, bokchoy ninja said:

    You use the redcat 51 with the star adventurer? Any issue with weight? Do you use a guider?

    Thanks!

    I'm waiting for the redcat (1.47kg) to arrive, I currently use A Sony 100-400 GM (1.3kg) on a A7R3 and have to use an WO Extension bar to balance it out, No guider!

    EDIT: One of the reasons i have opted for the Redcat is the 100-400 lens is a focus by wire so is a little awkward to hit focus manually. 

  12. 25 minutes ago, Sland said:

    To me, that is suspicious

    He did not say I couldn't post the email, when I asked him if he was ok with the idea of me posting the email, that question was one of a few he did not answer and I don't want to press him on that matter, I am personally very grateful of time he has given me. As for the Redcat and how capable it is, William is very confident in it, and his enthusiasm has passed on to me!   

     

     

  13. 5 hours ago, bokchoy ninja said:

    Holy moly, great looking shots. If I already have a nikkor 180mm f2.8, is there a reason to jump on this purchase? Or should I go longer to image smaller objects? I use a star adventurer and nikon d7100 btw.

    Not necessarily, you should be able to get great images from your set up, I also use the star adventurer and properly aligned should get 5+ minute exposures, alot relys on stacking software and skills with Photoshop/lightroom and this was using an astro modded D800.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.