Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

mark81

Members
  • Posts

    597
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by mark81

  1. I guess many people suffer this way.  I suppose you could take a couple of positives... You do have a great scope and you can get away to rural locations.  With a  bit of planning and some degree of luck and determination, you'll get there. I've got the opposite, rural skies, 80mm scope 😥

    I guess your using a decent light pollution filter? 

    Good luck with the rest of the challenge!

  2. Hi Paul

    I have used a pair of 8x40s, the Olympus dpsi, which give a very pleasing FOV, about 8degrees if I remember rightly and they are going to be that little less weighty than a 50mm but of course you are sacrificing that extra apeture  needed to pull out those fainter objects..  if the unstable image was an issue I would stick with the heavier larger bins and tripod mount them...

  3. It's an interesting subject Kronos.  I am very lucky to have Bottle 3/4 skies so many of the large DSOs like the Beehive, Andromeda etc are clearly naked eye visible.  My 10x50 binoculars here for example, can resolve mag 8 stars on a good night and mag 9 as very small grey pixels, but in outer London visiting family where the bottle is 8 I really struggle with everything through the bins so more aperture is essential.  Also reading other members observing reports from light polluted areas I have sometimes been surprised how little can be seen, so I would imagine an 8inch newt under bottle 3/4 to be amazing.  I think the 130 heritage will be very pleasing under dark skies - so many people sing it's praises and I wouldn't be surprised if it would rival your dob.

    Mark

  4. On 28/02/2019 at 17:38, PeterW said:

    New 70mm APM on an AZ3 modified many years back with a Beacon Hill simple bracket and weight bar for my old ST120 which would not balance when used at altitude.  Balances fine, need to add a Reddot/laser finder. Nice tight stars with 18mm and 13mm ep.
    Bought for daytime usage… as a two-eyed spotting scope, for which I use a lighter tripod as they’ll be pointing horizontally.

    Peter

     

    B470B654-1CC7-4657-85DE-DF94ABE79E33.jpeg

    They look great!  Look forward to reading some reviews and reports

  5. 1 hour ago, BinocularSky said:

    Here you go. For reference, I am 178 cm (5' 10") tall. (& No, I am not looking at the Sun & Yes, the objective caps are still on ? )

    In short, it can be done, but I wouldn't do it: too many legs in a territorial dispute for my liking, and my ageing neck really doesn't like looking up beyond about 45*.

     

    10x50 on AZ3 #1

     

    10x50 on AZ3 #2

    Thanks. I thought about the legs last night when I was out with the AZ3 and st80.  Camera tripod it will be.... And being attacked by the slow Mo controls doesn't look too appealing either ?

    • Like 2
  6. So I've spent many hours out with the ST80 using it for what it does best.  This year I have been wanting to get into something new, something I could learn lots more about and thought about the Moon.  I realise that when you think of Lunar observing, an ST80 may not spring to mind... But here goes.

    I started out today at 16.15, with my 6mm UWA which gave x66. Nice crisp craters down the Terminator. I picked out two large craters which looked like a pair of black eyes looking back at me and scanned my Moon Maps and found them to be Aristotles and Eudoxus. Mag wasn't enough to see any detail around or in them so I bumped up the 6mm with a Barlow and with some very careful focusing was very pleased with the result considering the scope I'm using.  I saw some nice subtle detail below Eudoxus which I believe to be some peaks.  I picked out the flat expanse of Mare Frigoris and even the crater Mitchell which sits right next to Aristotles.  I took a few sketches and borrowing an idea from an old astronomy book I have I came up with this.... Thanks for looking

     

    1547313326234726468563.jpg

    • Like 12
  7. 1 hour ago, wheresthetorch? said:

    My AR80S arrived this morning, so I thought I'd post a quick pic of it on my AZ5 mount.

    First impressions are that it is very light yet substantial, and feels very well made for such a budget price. First light has consisted of pointing at a TV aerial to line up my finderscope; image is crisp and clear with just a hint of CA either side of focus.  I guess that, despite being an achro the focal length of f7.5 helps with this.

    It is a little 'back heavy' with finder, diagonal and eyepiece but the mount holds it ok 

    The Crayford focusser is a little 'sticky' in coarse mode, but fine focus is smoother.  It's not as smooth and the 10:1 Crayford on my Revelation dob, so may need some adjusting.

    Can't wait for a proper first light if the clouds ever roll away!

     

    20181224_103003.jpg

    Looks great on the AZ5. I'm looking forward in hearing how this performs...

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.