Jump to content

Banner.jpg.39bf5bb2e6bf87794d3e2a4b88f26f1b.jpg

cubes

New Members
  • Posts

    22
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

10 Good

Profile Information

  • Location
    Norwich, UK
  1. Haven't had a chance to give it a go yet - typically it's been cloudy on all the nights I've been free
  2. Thanks. I'll have to give it some thought I guess. I'll try putting the t-ring on the 2" adapter with the 1.25" bit unscrewed and see what I get!
  3. Hi. I've got what appears to be a common problem - the DSLR won't focus when on the telescope due to a lack of inward travel. From what I've read here there's 2 solutions to this? (that don't involve a new telescope!) low-profile focuser or move the mirror up the tube. the focuser looks relatively easy to change, but how hard is moving the mirror, and are there any instructions? It's a Skywatcher explorer 200p. Thanks
  4. Not a daft question!! Yes, that's what I was doing wrong Thanks for help from you all
  5. Hi. I've just got a QHY5 to try guiding but I'm having a problem getting any image on PHD. The camera does work in QGVideo though. When in QGVideo without a scope it will show up light and dark but in PHD in the same circumstances just shows a black screen. I've tried PHD with the ASCOM drivers and CCDLabs Q-Guider settings. I'm obviously doing something basic wrong but I can't figure it out. Any ideas? Thanks
  6. I wasn't planning on using the galileoscope for guiding (although the thought crossed my mind), it was the only thing I had to hand to test out the camera. I did point it at the moon in phd as well (I used QGVideo to get the picture above) but couldn't even see the moon. Since I was getting rather cold and hadn't wrapped up I left it at that for today. It's probably just a setting somewhere, I'll take a longer look at the instructions
  7. Focusing the galileoscope to that accuracy is rather difficult
  8. I was pleased Couldn't get anything to show in PHD though. I'm sure some persistence will sort it out though.
  9. Got my QHY5 this morning. Dying to try it out but my scope is kept around my mother's house (much less light pollution there) and she's away for the weekend! So, I dragged out my galileoscope and tried the moon. Turned out not too bad. Also my first attempt at playing with registax for the video too. Ultimately this is going to be used as a guidecam and I'm sure I'll have a frustating time getting it working but I bet it'll be worth it!
  10. I was thinking about getting one of these for guiding. I'll need a laptop and find dell only do Win7 as 64 bit. If not I'll have to look at ebuyer,etc for 32bit ones. Will it work on this? If it works on 32bit vista I'd be sure enough that it works on 32 bit win 7 but from what I remember 64 bit windows requires signed drivers. Thanks for any help.
  11. Quick question (after reading the forum a bit). I probably won't be doing this yet (or maybe at all), but, how do you actually piggy-back the guidescope to the main scope?
  12. Nice, I'll have a look into doing that! I'll have to admit I was thinking "is my galileoscope good enough to do it?" (although I doubt it is)
  13. Thinking about it some more, I'll look into getting a side-by-side saddle and a small refractor and see how the EQ5 copes for now. If it struggles I'll have to look into the EQ6 (from what I read on the forums I'll end up with one sooner or later anyway). Until I do I'll try planetary and short-exposure imaging to get my hand it as well as practice polar, drift alignment etc.
  14. Thanks for the advice. I'll see what I can do with what I have for the time being, maybe I'll take the D40X to pieces (as I want to use the D300 for normal photos) to remove the IR filter from it. I realise I have a lot of practice to get in before I really need to get some new stuff but I certainly have some idea at what I should be looking for! The heavier mount was certainly something that came to mind and the EQ6 does look to be the business. I'll have to start saving some pennies as this is going to get expensive in the long term
  15. Hi. I've started on the long road to getting decent astroimages Currently I'm using a Skywatcher Explorer 200p on an EQ5 goto mount and imaging using my Nikon D300. Although I may take the IR filter out of my D40X and use that instead since I don't use it for normal photography anymore. Not done too badly with planetary objects (imo for a complete novice ) but I'm looking for advice on imaging DSOs. As I understand it, it's best (or pretty much required) to use some sort of autoguiding? From what I've read the EQ5 would struggle to have a guidescope on it as well, is that correct? If it can cope, would this be the way to go? I suspect that a CCD would ultimately be better but more cost in short term but could it be used for long exposure to take DSOs and guide at the same time? Sorry there are so many questions and thanks for any answers.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.