-
Posts
276 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by lnlarxg
-
-
-
-
Clear sky and weather meant I was able to do some more astrophotography on Monday night.
took a really long walk at 1am and found this perfect spot for this planetary shot, air was thin and very cold, but luckily my lens didn’t fog up. My heavy quadruplet felt very light so balancing was not an issue
401 shots of 0.5s exposures with SW Esprit 150 on SW SA mini. stacked in DSS and processed in Photoshop, final tweaks in Lightroom
Enjoy
- 3
- 6
-
So good, soooo good, so good in Ha alone already.
I do prefer the one with stars though.- 1
-
15 hours ago, Plodder said:
This pair are always a difficult, the background would benefit from SCNR as it is very green, a good mask and a background desaturation would make a big difference. Very nice otherwise.
Thanks I didn’t notice the green until you say so, I think my pc monitor has a slight different tonne to my iPad screen.
-
Processed data acquired from March. 1hr integration with Canon 550d + CLS filter & SW250Quattro, not started guiding/dithering a year ago but had the polemaster for bang on polar alignment, so it wasn’t too bad for 12x5min subs
Very useful masks made utilising Starnet++ in PixInsight, which helped isolating stars and structures for more aggressive background noise reduction to clean up the noisy canon550d at iso3200.
- 18
-
1 hour ago, PeterCPC said:
That should be M51.
Fingers getting fat
-
-
Awesome shots, people often overlook what conventional camera lenses can achieve, I think a quality lens is every bit as good as a quality scope
-
-
18 hours ago, Jamgood said:
wonderful image! more I look more appealing it becomesHow did you combine the 3 different exposures into 1? Did you simply chuck them all into the stacker? Or stacked separately first, then combined, if so which software did you use for the final integration?
thanks
- 2
-
-
-
Hi wondering if anyone can help.
Can light frames in .fits format be stacked with master dark/flat/bias frames in .tiff?
when stacking light frames in .fits format, with each of master calibration frames in .tiff, really bad final picture comes out
but if I chose all the .fits darks/flats/bias (the individual frames that make up the master), for stacking with the .fits light frames, the stacking Result is fine
Do master Calibration frames need to be in same format as the light frames?
you can see the picture on the right is the bad one. Both had a simple stretch in PIxinsight
-
3 hours ago, Astrid said:
Hi! Is the 130PDS good for visual observations too? And is it worth spending a bit more for the 150PDS? Thank you 😄
I think it’s pretty good. Not a planet killer due to short focal length, but still offers great planetary viewing, you can make out Jupiter’s bands and the division on Saturn’s ring. Moon looks very very good
for shy of 200£ you get quite good aperture, you can see brighter Nebula but they will be fuzzy, bearing in mind even through a 12” dob the deep sky objects are still dim and fuzzy
but for astrophotography, wow it is brilliant, good aperture and quite wide
so I think it is a good visual scope for beginner to keen hobbyists, but pretty intermediate to advance for astrophotographers
- 1
-
Need some advice Pls 🙂
i am under bortle 4 sky, imaging using f4 10” astrograph. What filter would you recommend for a asi294mc pro?
i have always shot with a modded DSLR, and I felt the astronomik cls filter definitely helpedthanks 😁
-
-
4 hours ago, jiberjaber said:
That's great and inspiring, I wonder where might be a good foreground round here to do something similar...
I reckon Dunwich Greyfriars will be amazing
- 1
-
17 hours ago, wormix said:
That’s very impressive - what equipment did you use?
Rokinon 14mm on a modded Canon 550d, tracked with star adventurer
- 1
-
-
130pds is available on Astro buy/sell. (Not mine, but not often they come on 2nd hand market).
https://www.astrobuysell.com/uk/propview.php?view=162385
-
3 hours ago, alacant said:
Hi
The effect is astigmatism and is common in the Baader cc. Centre field you're in focus. Left is due to inward focus error, right, outward focus error. Or vica versa. The in and out focus errors are because the camera's isn't held squarely in the light path. Even if it is, in my experience, there is still astigmatism.
Astigmatism causes the 90º rotation of star elongation you are seeing toward lateral extremities and is also responsible for the uneven cross shape in the astigmatic stars.
If you can't live with it and correction in software isn't acceptable, either the 2 element sw or the 4 element gpu or GSO ccs would fix it. You could also try substituting the secondary mirror or using a camera with a smaller sensor.
HTH and good luck.
Think the 4 element cc is same as sw’s own apalanatic cc, at least similar. Bit pricier but really great results. I got mine for the f4 imaging Newtonian, thought why not try it on the 130pds and am very happy I tested it -
It’s the tallest I have seen
-
Show us your set up in action at night.
in The Astro Lounge
Posted