Time for an update! After finally getting a clear night last night I went out to get a first light test done on the camera(despite the almost full moon). Forewarning, I was in a rush to set up and break down so the tracking on my mount wasn't near as good as I would have wanted it to be. Here is the flat that I took after some more removal that I ended up being "okay" with - http://i.imgur.com/noJpfqV.jpg I wanted to give people a bit of a comparison to go off of on why this is a good idea so thats exactly what my plan was when I started this. Back in October during a new moon phase, I took a 7 min exposure of the Crescent Nebula(no reason back then but Im glad I did). The subs for the image were 7 x 60. Last night I took a 7 min exposure of the Crescent Nebula with the debayered camera for comparison. The subs for the image were 14 x 30(tracking issues). I took one sub from each image, a 30 sec and a 60 sec and placed them side by side. This is the result - http://i.imgur.com/8GV3pxN.png This just blew me away. The fact that the 30 sec exposure under a FULL MOON has more data than a 60 sec exposure under a new moon phase is staggering. I, of course, have the two images for you and here is the 7 min exposure of the nebula before debayering - http://i.imgur.com/94OzHof.jpg Here is the 7 min exposure after debayering - http://i.imgur.com/86BFdTZ.jpg The debayered image IS slightly out of focus(like I said, I was in a rush) and neigher of the images used darks or flats(comparison people). But of course, I did take darks and flats to go along with the images from last night and this is what I have after about 10 min of post processing - http://i.imgur.com/70hc0xL.jpg Lights: 14 x 30 at 1600 ISO Darks: 10 x 30 at 1600 ISO Flats: 15 Despite the full moon being 100% on saturday, I am going back out again since its a clear night and I will have all night to properly set up and properly focus.