Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Astro_Gaz

Members
  • Posts

    214
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Astro_Gaz

  1. On 25/12/2023 at 09:44, gorann said:

    That is a great journey Gaz! The current one is excellent. I feel I have done a similar journey since I started back in 2015. This steady progress is of course a major factor in what makes this hobby so rewarding. Still, even if I think that my first images now look quite pathetic, I seem to remember that I was quite pleased with them at the time, actually quite excited, which is probably what kept me going.

    Yes, I know exactly what you mean.... I think this is why It's good to look back, as many Orion was and is one of my favourite nebulas to image, and I'm sure my latest won't be the last time I image it

    • Like 1
  2. On 24/12/2023 at 15:53, old_eyes said:

    A lovely set of images. I recognise the journey. The delight at the very first image, then the ambition to improve leading to progressively more interesting (I won't say better!) images.

    Mirrors my own journey to an extent, except I have never achieved the heights of your latest version!

    Astonishing image!

    Wow, thank you for your kind words :)

    • Like 1
  3. Orion was the first Astro image I ever did 13 years ago, below you can see my journey over the past 13 years I have posted the most recent image first to hopefully hook you in then it progresses from the first image I ever took.

    I've had lots of help along the way from my good friends Ray Leeson & Matt Foyle along the way 2 amazing blokes.

    latest image was taken with a QHY294m and William Optics Super Apo 80 mm f/480 mm combo

    older images have various Nikon cameras and QHY9m along with Celstron Nexstar 4SE & Orion Optics VX6

    Thank you for popping in for a look :)

     

    Gaz

    M42_Orion_Nebula.jpg

    188801_181540335223422_1030177_n.jpg

    820857_517638751613577_287258536_o.jpg

    830396_519549211422531_1598618349_o.jpg

    901405_662560240454760_786270600_o.jpg

    1462768_649663965077721_1958166237_o.jpg

    1483725_672372296140221_1692125058_o.jpg

    10856574_866074476770001_6091584650303174415_o.jpg

    • Like 23
  4. The Pelican Nebula - Narrowband Forax Colour Palette

    Ha - 4 hours
    Oiii - 1 hour 20 Minutes
    Sii - 2 hours 40 Minutes
    Total image time - 8 Hours  across 2 nights with a big moon above the horizon

    Telescope - William Optics 80mm Super APO
    Camera - QHY294M
    Filter Wheel - QHYCFW3L (with M adapter)
    Filters - Baader Ha LRGB, Optolong Sii & Oiii
    Reducer - William Optics Adjustable Flat6A III 0.8x
    Guiding - QHYOAG & QHY5ii
    Mount - NEQ6 (Belt Mod)
    Software - N.I.N.A / PHD2 / Pixinsight

    Pixinsight prosessing chain - ABE, BlurXTerminator, NoiseXTerminator, STF, HT, Pixel Math ForaxCombination, SCNR, Pixel Math Remove Magenta, Curves, ColourSaturation
    happy to share my prosessing chain should anyone require details please ask :) 

    Bortle - 4.7

     

    Pelican Nebula.jpg

    • Like 11
  5. My take on the Orion Nebula,

    like most, this was one of my first ever targets feels good to go back and re visit it, I will more than likely keep adding data to this over the years to come

    Ha - 40x300s
    Ha Core - 38x30s
    RGB - 30x120s in each filter
     

    Telescope - William Optics 80mm Super APO
    Camera - QHY294M
    Filter Wheel - QHYCFW3L (with M adapter)
    Filters - Baader Ha LRGB, Optolong Sii & Oiii
    Reducer - William Optics Adjustable Flat6A III 0.8x
    Guiding - QHYOAG & QHY5ii
    Mount - NEQ6 (Belt Mod)
    Software - N.I.N.A / PHD2 / Pixinsight

    Bortle - 4.5

    M42.jpg

    M42_NS.jpg

    Ha_ALL.jpg

    • Like 1
  6. On 29/08/2022 at 10:06, Stuart1971 said:

    No, I did it at the correct time and in the correct image and it worked perfectly just left about 4 of the bigger stars behind…whereas yours has removed every one…

    If you send a high-res version of yours to me, I'd be more than happy to run it through mine to see if it removes them for you? If so, please let me know and ill dm you my email address 

  7. 17 hours ago, Knight of Clear Skies said:

    You're welcome. I think starless versions often give a greater sense of depth which the starfield can often hide. Possibly something to do with how we perceive depth, we expect objects to blur with distance which doesn't happen with point sources. 

    Hi Olly, totally agree mate, I'm even toying with the idea of shooting the stars in RGB then adding them back in but might try that on the next image rather than a re visit on this one :)

     

  8. 1 minute ago, scotty38 said:

    ha that would actually not be a bad shout I guess at some point. I'm actually "testing" my kit on this very target at the moment as I'm waiting on my permanent setup. I only just got the mono camera and filters so I'm kidding myself I'm just playing at the minute and none of it matters if I mess up 🙂 🙂

    this was the first full image on this rig i had recently upgraded from the QHY9m, give me a shout if you get stuck with anything :) 

     

    • Like 1
  9. 4 minutes ago, Stuart1971 said:

    Beautiful rendition of this target, i have done this recently too, and just started with PI, can I ask what you used to remove the stars, as I used starnet 2, but found it left a few larger ones behind 

    cheers

    Hi Mate thanks for the kind words I also used StarNet 2 I've attached a screenshot of settings, hope it works out for you  image.png.7fe37265a1124a1192cd6feba04d2ad0.png

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.