Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Mikey0368

Members
  • Posts

    205
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Mikey0368

  1. On 22/08/2019 at 12:54, Mikey07 said:

    Thanks for the replies. On that basis I'm now thinking of 200 x 30s Lights at ISO800 with 40 Bias, 40 Darks and 40 Flats.

    I managed to get out last night and imaged the Witch's Broom as above. I lost 14 Lights to satellite and plane trails and stacked 90% of the remaining images (as they all looked pretty good), plus the Bias, Darks and Flats in DSS.

    AutoDev in StarTools suggests that I've got something to work with but the final image doesn't show it. That'll give me something to play with today!

     

    NGC6960AutoDev.jpg

    NGC6960Finished.jpg

  2. I'm relatively new to this so rather than waste a night trying things out I thought I'd bounce my plan off the experts. Please let me know if I'm on the right lines here or if I should be making any changes. I'm not sure how long to make the exposure or which ISO setting would be best for instance.

    Target - NGC 6960, Witches Broom.

    Equipment - SW HEQ5 Pro with Rowan Belt mod, SW Esprit 100ED Triplet, Flattener and astro modified Canon 600D. Camera software is APT.

    120 x 30s or 60s Lights at ISO400 or ISO800 (I'm very close to the southern edge of Edinburgh so light pollution is a bit of an issue).

    20 Bias, 20 Darks and 20 Flats.

    Stacking will be with DSS and processing with StarTools.

    Thanks.

  3. Well here's a screenshot of what I got from last night's data and it's fair to say that it aint good. It looks like someone has taken a sander to it! Any pointers on where I'm going wrong would be appreciated. The images were taken using........

    SW Esprit 100ED, SW HEQ5 Mount, Flattener (which is brand new and the first time I've used it), Modified Canon 600D, 24x120s and ISO800.

    I also have a decent .FTS file of M42 from last February so I'll run that through StarTools as well and see how it comes out.

    M31StarTools.jpg

  4. My set up is relatively new and I'm dabbling with some things while I impatiently wait for the clouds to clear and the skies to get a bit darker. I took 10 x 120s images of M31 last weekend and I've stacked them and tried to run them through StarTools. I've attached a couple of screenshots to show what the FTS file looks like and then how it looks once I hit the AutoDev button.

    When I compare the AutoDev outcome that I get to a YouTube tutorial it's nowhere near where I'd like it to be.  Is it simply because I only used lights and there are only 8 images that have been stacked?

     

    M31-01.jpg

    M31-02.jpg

  5. I ordered an Esprit 80 last week and went with the Es Reid bench test option. I'm really glad I did as although the telescope has passed, the flattener that I bought with it hasn't. I would never have worked that one out myself and would probably have just assumed that the problem was with the scope itself.

    It's a bit frustrating that I have to wait a little longer but at least I know it'll be right when I get it. I'm like a kid waiting for Christmas and I don't even know when Christmas Day is  ?

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.