Sanity check required. With retirement fast approaching, and with an interest in space, science-fiction (heavy on the science) and astronomy, I thought it was time to dive into a new hobby. My first thought was to blow the budget on the biggest, fanciest telescope I could get my hands on - a 120-127mm refractor, a 200mm Newtonian or a big Dobsonian - but reading this thread -
- made me change my mind; however, I do want to get something to start out with, to at least get me out and looking at the night sky.
My thinking now is to get myself a Starwatcher Evostar 90 on an EQ3-2 mount. Please check my reasoning.
This is a very affordable telescope, currently about £260, suitable for viewing the moon, planets, some stars.
It should be a good match for the EQ3-2 mount. One of the downsides mention in reviews is that the lighter mounts can be too flimsy. (And I have some ideas involving steel shot and resin)
I am used to using optical theodolites and levels, so I am not put off by an equatorial mount. It will be a learning curve, but one I'm happy with. This will also help if I ever graduate to something larger/more complex. And I understand the mount can be set up to operate as an Alt/Az as well?
Can even have a RA motor drive attached, although one of the locals was a bit sceptical about this.
Any extras I pick up could be transferred over to a replacement.
So...does this make sense (or have I gone completely bananas)? Answers on a postcard please...
I can't find an exact figure, but I think the combined weight comes in at about 7-8kg, so easy enough to move around.