Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

  • entries
    5
  • comments
    3
  • views
    4,896

Success at last!!!


JohnSadlerAstro

1,466 views

Hi,

Ok, so its been the worst January for Clear Sky that I can remember.:clouds2::clouds1: But there's still some results!!! My tracking limits me to frames of around 1minute, but at 200mm, f/5.6, that's not too bad. I'll probably do some drift-alignment later this month, as I never really had much opportunity in December. The images can probably have a bit more processing done on them, especially M42, but otherwise, I think that I've more than fulfilled my dreams!!!:icon_biggrin:

 

I think my favourite bit about it is that I've been using 'sub-minimal' equipment. My copy of 'Making Every Photon Count' declares that an EQ3 is the absolute minimum needed for DSO imaging. My mount is an EQ2, and my camera/lens setup cost only £200.

So, anyone reading this, GO AHEAD!!! even if your equipment is basic, like mine, there's masses you can do!!!:smiley::smiley::smiley:

John

 

M31, Andromeda Galaxy

M31-07_01_2016.thumb.jpg.fcb264c6bc9d76e

M45, Pleiades

56c305ab40afc_M452.thumb.jpg.5b74de01cd4

M42, Orion (Great) Nebula and the Running Man Nebula

56c30339a4db0_Processed2.thumb.jpg.7139c

  • Like 1

3 Comments


Recommended Comments

3 hours ago, employee2-4601 said:

That shot of M31 just blows me away! Absolutely beautiful and so clear. What camera equipment are you using?

Hi,

Thanks! I'm using a second-hand Canon 1000d, which cost around £120, and a second-hand 55-200mm lens costing £60. I'm then using a home made wooden adapter to attach the tripod screw thread on the cam to the head of my EQ2. The adapter simply has 3 holes in it--one has a bolt with the right size of thread on it to screw into the cam, and the other 2 holes take the bolts on the mount head that screw into the scope tube rings. Because its wood, the adapter also helps dampen out vibration. My EQ2 has an RA tracking drive, and I use drift alignment (the EQ2 doesn't have a polar scope). I'm generally limited to 1 minute subs, but it appears that with enough subs, most objects I've tried come out well. If I remember right, the M31 image has about 35-40 subs, each of one minute and then a few 1.5 minute ones that I took as a test run the night before.

 

This is one of the subs for M31, I usually capture in RAW mode, as the camera doesn't compress the pictures then.

Sub.thumb.jpg.13d276e802830128ecda2ded91

John

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Hi,

Reprocess of M42, using 20X1 minute subs @ ISO800, and 10X10sec subs @ ISO 800 from last night as well as the old 35X51 sec subs as used above.

 

56ce12f1f0772_Processed3.thumb.jpg.4d842

John

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.