Jump to content

SkySurveyBanner.jpg.21855908fce40597655603b6c9af720d.jpg

  • entries
    23
  • comments
    103
  • views
    31,503

M 27 - A View from a City


Qualia

1,055 views

M 27 - The Dumbbell Nebula

General Observations

Messier discovered M 27 in 1764. Some twenty years later, William Herschel recognised its peculiar shape. His son, John, called it the Dumbell and the moniker stuck. In the 19th century, Huggins observed that it wasn't composed of unresolved stars as was originally believed, but through the new science of spectroscopy, realised M 27 was in fact a gigantic cloud composed of luminous gas.

Along with M 57, the Ring Nebula, M 27 is one of the most observed deep space objects (DSOs) in ameteur astronomy and there is an obvious reason for this: it is a giant of a planetary nebula with a high degree of surface brightness which takes high magnification remarkably well.

What you are seeing is essentially the remains of a dying supergiant star whose decomposition is creating boundaries of chaos where hot, ionized gas is pushing out onto older, cooler gaseous clumps. M 27's inner section is made up of huge structures of gas and dust somewhere between 20 to 60 million kilometers in size containing the matter of about 3 or 4 times the mass of Earth. These superstructures - for want of a better word - have sufficient density to cast opaque shadows onto the lighter, cooler outer regions giving the nebula that peculiar 'dumbbell' shape.

The total diameter of M 27 is estimated to be about 6 light years across whose boundary is said to be expanding about 2 to 3 inches every century, whilst its inner region at about 6 to 8 inches. M 27 is between 1,150 to 1,350 light years away with an age of around 9,000 to 10,000 years, making it a relatively young nebula. M 57, for example, is about twice as old.

City Observations

The first time I stumbled upon M 27 I had to double check the late night sky to make sure I hadn't found a solitary, wandering cloud; after observing smaller, fainter, nebula structures, I wasn't prepared for the sheer size of the thing. At low magnification it appears as a large, fuzzy cloud-like patch of an indeterminate nature, a blob, so to say, but with the aid of the UHC-S Nebula Filter (Baader), its famous two lobe structure is brought out.

I have included sketches both without the filter (on the right) and with the filter (on the left) which will hopefully give some idea of what is being viewed. I thought it was also a good idea to include these two sketches for it may help future astronomers decide if the filter is worth its price or not. Note how the nebula is brought-out with the filter, how it takes on a more defined structure but with a notable reduction in star content. It follows that the UHC-S will be pretty redundent when hunting down nebulae.

The sketches were made using white and grey chalk and brush for the nebula itself, whilst a finely sharpened, white charcoal pencil was used for plotting the stars on the black paper.

  • Like 2

5 Comments


Recommended Comments

Nice sketches, Qualia. I found the side by side comparison regarding the filter very instructive! Thanks!

  • Like 1
Link to comment

The first time I looked at the sketches I was thinking that the filter made the nebula worse - then I adjusted the viewing angle of my screen and suddenly I could see what you meant.

Interesting observation and the issue with the screen has made me think (somewhat laterally) about when I view through a scope: to stop being so impatient and to try the usual observing tricks, adjust my view etc.

As always - a gratefully received blog entry - I tend to look at planets and doubles but (if the clouds ever clear [blah blah]) then it looks like I may go DSO hunting for a change.

BTW: when's the book coming out?

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Thanks for the note, Carl. I am the one who should be truly grateful and thank you for reading the entry.

To be honest, the chalk sketches look cool in the flesh, but when scanned into the computer do lose something of their 'quality'. I will have to figure what to do about this - whether it might be better to make a pencil sketch and invert the colours or find myself some digital camara.

I think it's a great idea of yours to try those observing tricks. When it comes to an evening's viewing, for example, I tend to take it slow. Over the two hour alotement, I'll have a plan of either one DSO and one double and general wandering about or a planet and one double and wandering and I will try to stick to that for the evening. Nothing rushed. With M 27, I spent two sessions just looking at it and then picked up the chalk brush.

I really hope the skies clear for you, but then at the moment it's not really all that good. Unless you can go to bed really late, the night skies this month are just too bright. I've pretty much called it a day for DSOs for July.

  • Like 1
Link to comment

I'm afraid at my latitude its pretty much not dark at any time (llowing for the LP), assuming the clouds ever let me see the sky for more than a minute! I tried to find the Ringrecently with my 100rs, but gave up.

However, you are right, there is no substitute for time at the eyepiece. I think alimited range of targets in an observing slot is a sensible plan for that reason.

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.