Jump to content

My next eyepiece purchase - opinions please


Recommended Posts

Hi all,

Im going to buy a medium-high power EP as my next astro-purchase and would like some opinions please.

I want something about 8-9mm to use in both my 120mm achro and the 10" dob.

I want to improve my view of DSOs like M3 - i currently use a 10mm skywatcher super plossl and see this as a blob in the refractor; in the dob i can resolve stars, but only using averted vision. Im aiming to be able to look directly at M3 in the dob and maybe resolve a few stars with averted vision in the achro.

At the moment im thinking of an 8mm televue plossl (are they really better than other cheaper plossls?) or a 9mm abbe ortho. Am I on the right lines here, and will i be able to achieve what im trying to achieve? Any other opinions and suggestions are welcome.

I want to spend about £60. I dont wear glasses.

thanks guys

warren

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sorry i forgot to mention that i already own a 5mm TS planetary HR, 6.4mm kellner, 10mm skywatcher SP, 25mm LET plossl, 32mm SWAN (i own no barlow) - if this makes any difference to what i should be choosing.

thanks again

w

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a 9mm baader ortho and it's excellent, but not very comfortable to use on the dob due to the small FoV. Orthos come up often 2nd hand at 50£ or less.

I never used a TV plossl but all I read about them was great so I suspect it's a good choice. TMB planetary also gets decent reviews and they have a wider FoV and longer ER. An interesting review I found sometime ago: 9mm Nagler vs 9mm BO/TMB Planetary - Review

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks

The TS planetary HR ones are supposed to be the same as the TMBs. theyre available from Modern astronomy for £54.

Having six elements, i was discounting one of those for faint objects like M3, as ive tried my 5mm one and it wasnt very good (although its great on mars/saturn) maybe its where the magnification is too high and not down to the eyepiece design???

hmmmm after reading that review (thanks paulo) maybe i should consider a 9mm planetary??

hmmmm

w

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I often find too much mag on faint DSOs is not good and end up seeing more at low mag, where it gets smaller but more defined.

I think only dark skies and aperture can help you there, but seeing you already have a 10" scope there's not much you can improve there, unless you go for a 14 or 16".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks

The TS planetary HR ones are supposed to be the same as the TMBs. theyre available from Modern astronomy for £54.

Having six elements, i was discounting one of those for faint objects like M3, as ive tried my 5mm one and it wasnt very good (although its great on mars/saturn) maybe its where the magnification is too high and not down to the eyepiece design???

hmmmm after reading that review (thanks paulo) maybe i should consider a 9mm planetary??

hmmmm

w

Hi,

Thanks for the heads up. It's the only thing they stock that I couldn't have got cheaper elsewhere, looking at their Baader prices, they do offer price matching. Never heard of him/them before anyone have good/bad experiences. I would call them first to make sure they are actually in stock.

I agree re: mag on DSOs, I may use the TMB on bright DSOs, but I did buy it for planetary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Warren,

Re the TV Plössls, I've found that they feel crisper/more contrasty than my Omni Plössls. They also seem to just "drop" into focus without effort, unlike the Omnis, and show truer colour transmission.

Assuming that the 10" Dob is f/5, with a fL of 1250mm, then M3 should just fit in the FOV of a 9mm Ortho, an 8mm TV Plössl would show a bit more. You'd get slightly more FOV in your XLT 120.

At f/5 I'd prefer an Ortho over a Plössl, even a TV one, for crispness to the edge of the field. At f/8.3 in the 'frac things should be a little more equal.

Second hand you can get an 8mm TV Plössl for about 40 - 50 quid. A 9mm Baader Ortho (same thing as the Circle T/UO HD Orthos?) would be £50 - £55. And a 9mm Circle T/UO volcano top Ortho should cost around 20 to 25 quid.

HTH

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

Thanks for the heads up. It's the only thing they stock that I couldn't have got cheaper elsewhere, looking at their Baader prices, they do offer price matching. Never heard of him/them before anyone have good/bad experiences. I would call them first to make sure they are actually in stock.

I agree re: mag on DSOs, I may use the TMB on bright DSOs, but I did buy it for planetary.

I ordered my ts planetary from modern astronomy with no problems, its a good firm in my opinion - see the supplier reviews section. I bet they sell stacks of those EPs.

w

w

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Warren,

Re the TV Plössls, I've found that they feel crisper/more contrasty than my Omni Plössls. They also seem to just "drop" into focus without effort, unlike the Omnis, and show truer colour transmission.

Assuming that the 10" Dob is f/5, with a fL of 1250mm, then M3 should just fit in the FOV of a 9mm Ortho, an 8mm TV Plössl would show a bit more. You'd get slightly more FOV in your XLT 120.

At f/5 I'd prefer an Ortho over a Plössl, even a TV one, for crispness to the edge of the field. At f/8.3 in the 'frac things should be a little more equal.

Second hand you can get an 8mm TV Plössl for about 40 - 50 quid. A 9mm Baader Ortho (same thing as the Circle T/UO HD Orthos?) would be £50 - £55. And a 9mm Circle T/UO volcano top Ortho should cost around 20 to 25 quid.

HTH

thanks davido - is there much difference between the volcano tops and the baader orthos (except for price)?

w

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did extensive reading on this before buying mine. The 2 diferences are:

- slightly better coatings (may increase contrast/sharpness a tiny bit, barely noticeable unless your really looking for it... or so I read)

- The baader orthos are parfocal (if you have a bunch of them you can switch them without adjusting focus)

I just went for them cause I have this bad habit of second guessing my purchases so going for the ones the experts said ware best guaranteed I would not be tempted to upgrade later and loose money in the process. I also didn't had the chance to try any of this out unless I bought them (only know a couple of astronomers and they mainly have plossls). If I could go to a star party to actually try some of this before buying I would take the chance!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I ordered my ts planetary from modern astronomy with no problems, its a good firm in my opinion - see the supplier reviews section. I bet they sell stacks of those EPs.

w

w

Hi,

Yep I checked with MA and they have them all in stock and Bernard doesn't know how the rumour about shortages started. I had never heard of MA before, but judging by the feedback in the forum they seem an excellent supplier. Bookmarked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.