Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

Why is T Cep so bright in this image? August 2022


Recommended Posts

Screenshot_20240512_164904.thumb.png.71edc91960d00ec6a7059d86fe946a26.png

I was wondering why in this older image I took on a full-spectrum Nikon D3200, that T-Cep was so bright.

It is supposed to be at least 2 magnitudes darker than Alfirk even when it's at the peak of its variable phase, but despite how big and bright it looks in the image it has no halo like Alfirk.

Could it be something to do with the camera's full-spectrum mod?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

T Cep is a red giant of colour index B-V = 1.5 so most of its light is in the red part of the spectum. My guess is that its magnitude in R band is way higher than the visual (V) and your astromodified camera is very sensitive in the red. 

Edited by Nik271
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

PS: just looked it up at AAVSO, in I (near infrared) in August 2022 T Cep has observed magnitude of less than 3.  

Edited by Nik271
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nik271 said:

T Cep is a red giant of colour index B-V = 1.5 so most of its light is in the red part of the spectum. My guess is that its magnitude in R band is way higher than the visual (V) and your astromodified camera is very sensitive in the red. 

1 hour ago, Nik271 said:

PS: just looked it up at AAVSO, in I (near infrared) in August 2022 T Cep has observed magnitude of less than 3.  

I suppose that would make sense then, it still seems a bit odd that it has no halo vs Alfirk's prominent one but the percieved brightness in blue vs R-NIR would explain the core size similarity.

Thanks!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks both,

I had exactly the same question!

A couple of nights ago I took the attached shot of T Cep. 

On later inspection, I couldn't understand why T Cep was so bright when the star to the right (HD201731) was nominally a very similar magnitude. I discovered that it was a variable star, but even at its brightest, it couldn't account for the apparent difference I was seeing. As you can see, the comparison is striking - so much so that I estimated it to be 3 or 4 magnitudes brighter than it should be!

I knew that had read somewhere about CCD cameras having a 'red sensitivity' (maybe on the CBAT site for supernova reporting), but I wasn't sure if the same was true of CMOS. 

I certainly looks like it is!

Equipment: 6 inch Skywatcher GoTo coupled to an ASI 183MC camera.

Stack_25frames_268s_WithDisplayStretch.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.