Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

In praise of the ST80


Ags

Recommended Posts

I have had an ST80 for a long time but have hardly used it because of lacking a satisfactory mount and lacking suitable eyepieces. I've finally figured out I can actually mount the scope on my AZ3 clone with both tube rings, and I have some good ES 82 and 68 eyepieces, so I have been able to have some satisfactory sessions with the "little" scope. Looking at the Double Cluster last night (using a 6.7mm EP for 60x) - and it was a very good view indeed - I was surprised to see the view was as bright if not brighter than it had been in my  old Nexstar 4SE 102mm Mak. 

That got me thinking about how much light each scope would let through - they both have a diagonal so we can ignore that. 

Mak 102: Because of the corrector plate spreading the light off the edges of the primary mirror, true aperture is ~97mm (rough guess), so 0.9 transmission. The CO is around 34% so that's another 0.9 transmission. Main mirror and secondary have 0.9 transmission each, giving 0.9^4 = 0.65 transmission, or 81% of the original aperture. So the real ideal light gathering of my old mak was approximately 83mm.

ST80: The ST80 has two layers of glass from its doublet primary, which must have a transmission of at least 98% each. One of those lenses is cancelled by the Mak's corrector plate, so the ST80 has 99% effective aperture, or 79mm.

Assuming my maths is roughly right, it's no surprise the ST80 can give similar views to the Mak of deep sky objects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.