Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

Maniek

Members
  • Posts

    19
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Maniek

  1. 100 degree really pulled me in. I would rather go with the whole serię only to DSO. I have repeatedly compared Morpheus with ES, and although it is a completely different power, I prefer the saturation of ES colors to the faded stars of Morpheus. For example, in the double Perseus  cluster there are several characteristic orange stars. They are wonderful in ES. With Morpheus this Orange is not So obvious. On the other hand, this coolness of Baader does AN excellent job on the Moon. There is a lot of talk about ugly edge brightening in 4,5mm. Considering that the price of Baader is 75% Delo/t6/XW it May be worth playing extra for flawless quality... 

    • Like 1
  2. Hello. A New eyepiece has been with me for some Time. After a long reflection I bought the ES 14mm 100 degree. What can I say... Excellent EP! 😍 Great color saturation, endless field. A great decision. I also have Morpheus 9mm and I'm a bit disappointed with it. It's a cold and tight compared to ES😏. I use it for the moon and my question is Born here. I like the Wide view of the lunar and I have to choose Nagler 5mm t6 vs Delo 4,5. However, I found report with a difficult eye placement on Delo. Can you respond to that? Would t6 be better on the planet, moon? 

    • Like 1
  3. I have good eyesight and I don't Wear glasses. But... 

    The set has two EP. Tiny Plossl 9mm. It's ergonomics is a mistake, a Tiny Lens in which you need to Press the eye. It's no good. The other is 30mm Erfle and that suits me. Big Lens and comfortable ER. That's I reject ES100. Ethos, ES92, Apm remain, because Wide field for DSO is a condition. Apm as I read collets good reviews but I Just don't like it (rubbish plastics). It May be silly but it is. Ethos vs ES92 would be my choice... 

    Ethos

    + excellent quality, value

    + accept ergonomics

    + weight

    - high price

    ES92

    + acceptable quality

    + excellent ergonomics

    + good price

    - high weight

    In order not complicate myself with these two EPs I will choose. 

  4. 31 minut temu John powiedział:

    Mam ES 17 92, a do niedawna ES 12 92. Są to na pewno świetne okulary. Nie dostałem odstępu 12 mm, więc teraz się zmieniłem. Na razie mam jeszcze 17 mm. Moim zdaniem są jednymi z najlepszych, jakie opracował ES, ale tak naprawdę, o ile widzę, nie poprawiam Etosu poza ulgą wzrokową.

    Zawsze jest coś lepszego niż ty, a ja mam gdzieś tam lub w najbliższej przyszłości. Zwykle koszt jest bardzo wysoki, a dostępność bardzo niska, a rzeczywiste różnice w wydajności subtelne niuanse lub ergonomiczne preferencje.

    Ponadto wybór okularów jest bardzo osobisty, więc należy 100% koncentracji na „najlepszych” po prostu nie zdarza się z mojego doświadczenia : rolleyes2:

     

    Just buy one and enjoy the views. 

  5. To be honest, my belief in the Perfect choice has been a Little shaken🙄. You May actually need at look at more affordable options. I don't know anymore... 

    Yesterday I read a lot about ES92 12 and 17mm for the price of the one Ethos. It looks like they are collecting great reviews. Advise the newcomer but honestly because I have already stupid😫... 

  6. 14 hours ago, cletrac1922 said:

    Maniek

    Witamy z Land Down Under, Australia

    Na tym forum podróżujesz po wszechświecie

    Nie bój się zadawać żadnych pytań, ponieważ wiele osób tutaj chętnie doradzi

    Jakiego rodzaju sprzęt zakupiłeś i czy masz czyste niebo, z którego masz spore ilości światła

    Mam trochę zanieczyszczenia świetlnego tam, gdzie jestem

    Jan

    Hello. 

    I have Dobson 10" for several months. I live in the countryside on the outskirts of 30. 000 cities. The sky 5-5,5mag. On good nights I can See the Milky Way perfectly. I, m Just learning and it's a great adventurer. 

    Greetings. 

  7. jaJust reviewed both Nikon and Docter UWA. Gentelmen, it's not BMW, it's AstonMartin😮

    I think I will stay with TV. Thank for all the help. I am absolutely sure of my choice. When I turn on the first light I will describe the impressions. 

    You have experience gained over the years and measured by hundreds of EPs. Having a telescope for a few moment I base my choice on voices like yours. That's why I think it's a good choice. And whether it is Ethos, Delo, XW or other is probably Just a matter of personal feelings, because in the difference of the image the hair will probably not fit. 

    • Like 1
  8. I full agree. 

    There are many other, cheaper and not much worse EP that you can also enjoy. However, the quality of Ethos is indisputable. This set I dreamed of is not a whim of a Rich guy. On the contrary. I work hard and if I have a goal I can Save money. 

    Let's say you want a New car. You dreamed about a BMW series 3. Every one ssys it's a great car. You Save money. And I say "Hey, Man! Why do you need a BMW? Buy a Fiat. That's what you can drive witch."  But you Just want BMW. 

    It all comes down Our choices.

    And what Jon said. I will change the telescope in some Time. Maybe 14" or 16" and good EP will remain. 

    Because telescope is Just antenna. The screen with your favorite movie is an eyepiece. 

    • Like 2
  9. To be honest I would like to stary on TV. I agree that 21 will be needed, but for the sake of finances I will leave at the end. I also thought about 17 instead of 21. I currently have a set Erfle 30 and Plossl 9. I think E13 will come first. 

  10. Hello. 

    I have Newton 10 " dobson for several months. Most of the observation także me of the Moon although I like DSO. Let's 70% to 30%.

    I would like to build a target set of eyepiece. I look at Televue and after Reading hundreds of posts, comparisions and tests I have chosen this set:

    Ethos 13

    Ethos 8 

    Delos 6

    Delos 4,5 

    I am asking for grades, opinions and corrections. 

    Greetings. 

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.