-
Posts
4 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by steerroger
-
-
Thanks everyone! The Baader 1mm optical length might solve the problem that I mentioned on another thread.
-
I've just spent a frustrating afternoon, lashing up various combinations for an Explore 102mm f7, for use with a binoviewer. The ES has a focussing travel of 45mm. To compensate, they supply it with spacer tubes. These tubes are both about 37mm. The result is that if the point of focus is fully racked-out without a tube, it is nearly fully racked-in with a tube. Would it have been too much trouble to have made one of the tubes about 22mm, which would move it from racked-out, to the centre of travel? Have others found this problem and solved it?
-
I've just spent a frustrating afternoon, lashing up various combinations for an Explore 102mm f7. There will be more in another post about this. Along the way, I examined my collection - 4, I think, 1.25" to 2" adaptors. Every one has a loose locking screw. I am not sure if it is the accuracy of the tap used, the die used on the screw, or the poor quality of either piece of metal - This is my guess. probably the adaptor, as it doesn't get better when a stainless steel socket screw is used. Why are they all so poor, and does anyone make decent ones? I know that twist-lock/self centering ones are better, but if you want several, they cost a lot!
1.25" to 2" adaptors
in Discussions - Eyepieces
Posted
Damn! I thought it was a grub screw with a key. I have a JMI one on an old 10" dob. It too needs a cutaway. I wonder it the grub screw method might work on that.