Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_solar_25_winners.thumb.jpg.fe4e711c64054f3c9486c752d0bcd6f2.jpg

sxinias

Members
  • Content Count

    90
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

7 Neutral

About sxinias

  • Rank
    Nebula

Profile Information

  • Location
    Greece
  1. Hi, probably a little late in responding to your question but just in case others are interested. I do a lot of work with the ST80 and yes I do have the dreaded blue halos around stars. At one time I tried to get rid of the blue but now I pretty much leave it alone as it is part of the process with an inexpensive refractor. Here is a link to my flickr site that has many images made with a ST80 on either a SkyWatcher SynScan AZ goto mount or a 4/5SE mount in the equatorial mode. Joe http://www.flickr.com/photos/59237884@N08/
  2. I had a similar problem with my SkyWatcher AZ goto mount which is similar to your mount. Turned out to be a defective mountthat was replaced by the vendor (Green Witch). The replacement mount worked great out of the box and continues to do so 6 years later.
  3. I once tried a Baader Semi APO filter with a Canon 1000D and an Orion ST80A. I made several images of Vega with and without the filter. The blue fringe was present with or without the filter albeit slightly paler with the filter.
  4. Congratulations on your new telescope and first light report. It's one of the best reports I've read. Enjoy your new baby.
  5. Hi, I have a SW SynScan AZ GOTO mount which is pretty much the same as the SLT mount and has the identical tripod. While I have not had the mount on a pier, I do put it on my CG5 tripod occassionally. The mount undergoes a transformation on the CG5 tripod and should behave similar on a rigid pier. Vibration is not existant and gotos are very accurate. I can even put my 8 inch SCT LX200 OTA on it and obtain accurate gotos. The rigid mount greatly facilitates focusing, needless to say. As far as the tripod goes, there are some simple things that improve it. Tighten up all the nuts and bolts, especially the bolts that attach the tripod leg sockets to the tripod head. Inject superglue or epoxy in the paper thin crack between the upper tripod leg and its upper and lower sockets beiing careful not to get glue on any moving parts. Always have the accessory tray installed and locked in place. Do not extend the extension legs any more than need be. 30 % at the most. You can remove the extendable legs and wrap them to increase their diameter and reduce wobble. The above will not eliminate vibration but does dampen it and reduce decay times.
  6. I think you probably can put your Lyra 4" on the SynScan AZ goto mount with no problem. A little over three years ago, I put my C6S OTA on a SkyWatcher SynScan AZ goto mount and have operated it that way since then .. a home made 6SE in a way. The C6S OTA is at 10 pounds (4.5 kg). So far the mount has held up just fine. The only issues are related to the tripod which is less than stellar and required some modification to stiffen it. I have even attached a focal reducer and a DSLR to the C6S/SkyWatcher AZ mount and photographed some deep space objects. The weight with the camera is 12 pounds (5.4kg). Here is NCG 0253 taken on 9 Nov 2012 with the C6S on the Skywatcher SynScan AZ goto mount (123 frames stacked for a total time of 58 m 40 s, Canon EOS 1000D at 1600 ISO)
  7. Lovely. I do admire your patience ... 7 hours. Congratulations.
  8. Nice shot. The wide angle star field adds a lot.
  9. My first DSO was the Sagittarius Star Cloud M24 taken piggyback (Canon 1000D, an old 55mm f/2.2 SLR lens, SkyWatcher AZ GOTO mount, 1600ISO, 20 seconds). Six months later I captured M1 (total exposure of 17 minutes, C6S with CG5 mount and 6.3 focal reducer, Canon 1000D at 1600 ISO. This was also my first shot using a polar aligned equatorial mount ) One year later M8 (Canon 1000D, 1600 ISO. Total exposure time 30 minutes and 56 seconds, C6S OTA with a f6.3 focal reducer using a SkyWatcher SynScan AZ GOTO mount and tripod). My favorite M45, Pleiades Rising, piggy back taken 3 months after I started (30 second esposure, 800 ISO; 55 mm f/2.2 lens, Canon EOS 1000D camera, SkyWatcher SynScan AZ GOTO Mount)
  10. Thanks for the roses. Photography with a SkyWatcher AZ GOTO mount and its shaky tripod is a challenge. Basically I am curious at what can be done with mounts like it. Last year about this time, I was just starting down the road of astrophotography. I decided to see what a beginner, photography wise, can do with mounts like the SkyWatcher AZ goto, SLT, DS2000, and 4SE. At the time it seemed like a good project to pursue ... and still does as I am having a ball of fun doing it. My C6S or 2045LX3 OTA (4 inch SCT) on my CG5 is where I will end up eventually. In the mean time I am learning a lot of techniques, etc. that I can use. I will also have the capability of "grab and go astrophotography" so to speak using lightweight, portable equipment. There are a lot of limitations and issues using entry level az mounts for astrophotography. It will never compete with digital images taken with traditional equipment. However, I think that it can be very competitive with the film guys. At the moment, I trying to use the 4SE mount in the equatorial mode. The mount has one serious design deficiency .... there is no practical way to make fine adjustments in azimuth and altitude needed to do a precise polar align. I've modified the wedge to provide a way to do a fine altitude adjustment but azimuth still requires actual mount movement; a hit and miss proposition. I obtained three minute unguided exposures with it on one occassion but have not been able to repeat or even come close to that time since. Too bad I didn't use that luck on a loto ticket instead. Typical unguided times range from 30 seconds (easy) to one minute (not so often) dependent upon the luck of the polar alignment. The only advantage I see with the 4SE mount in the equatorial mode is that you can do short exposure astrophotography within 30 degrees of the zenith and not worry about field rotation. This in itself is a great advantage over azimuth photography as it does give you the capability to photograph anywhere in the night sky and to photograph where the atmosphere is the thinnest. The 4SE in the Azimuth mode is better than the Skywatcher AZ GOTO (SLT) mount as it has far less vibration issues from tracking and from the tripod with field rotation being the governing factor for most of the sky. I have also tried Meade's DS2000 mount with a Meade 2045LX3 OTA (4" SCT). I was not able to do anything with it due to the way the mount tracks objects. Hopefully someday I can beg, borrow, or steal a SkyWatcher EQ3 goto and see what it can do. The Celestron SLT mount is so similar to the SkyWatcher SynScan AZ goto mount that I think, but don't know for sure, that the charateristics of the two are the same. Dark skies, don't I wish. I'm located on the edge of Athens' urban area. However, the sea is to the south of me and when the humidity is low and the moon is not around, this the summer I can some details of the Milky Way as well as a couple of Messier objects in the star cloud with my eyes. After objects pass the meridian, forget it as the light glow from Athens drowns everything except the brightest stars. One good fallout from Greece's economic crises is the local government does not have money to replace street lights when they burn out ........ A year ago, taking any photos from my home would have been impossible due to the street lights and forget about seeing the Milky Way. The vignetting problem is most likely from the Hirsch 6.3 focal reducer as I don't seem to have the problem when I don't use it. This could be an exposure issue though. However with 16-20 second exposure times, I need as fast a scope as I can get. I'm fairly new at photography and, other than using dark frames, have not yet ventured into other corrections. That's on the list and thanks for the recommendations. I'll certainly look into them. At the moment trying to figure out the mysteries of CS5 is keeping me occupied. Yes, the exposures were 16 seconds. Statistically 16-20 seconds is about the longest exposure time I can obtain with the SkyWatcher AZ goto mount and have a 80% or so probability of getting a good shot without vibration from tracking gears, wind, dangling camera strap, breathing too hard, etc. I also wanted to reduce field rotation as much as possible. At my latitude, if I stay about 30 degrees away from the zenith, I can get 30 seconds or more exposures with 0.10 degrees field rotation. Unfortunately, this removes a big piece of the sky where the atmosphere is thin for photography. My camera is a stock Canon EOS 1000D as it came out of the box. One thing I have learned; 100, 16 second shots stacked are not the same as 10, 160 second shots stacked. 16 to 20 seconds is not much time to capture a lot of photons and the exposures are chronically underexposed. I use 1600 ISO even though it adds noise. I had hopped the 6.3 focal reducer would allow me to go down to 800 ISO but 1600 even with the focal reducer seems to do better. I do cull out poor exposures during stacking as they only tend to add noise. AZ photography with a tracking dob. The wind is an enemy. A lot of sail area to catch the wind. Back focus could also be an issue. However, if you have a DSLR, you are only risking the price of a t ring and adapter. I've seen some shots on one of the forums, I forget which one, where a guy got some neat photographs of some Messier objects with a DOB photographing through the eyepiece. Here's my M20. Photograph taken on 27 June 2011 with a Canon EOS Rebel XSi (1000D), 1600 ISO. Total exposure time 41 minutes and 7 seconds. Telescope was a Celestron C6S Schmidt Cassegrain Optical Tube Assembly with a f6.3 focal reducer using a SkyWatcher SynScan AZ GOTO mount. I'm thinking about going back and processing it again.
  11. M 8, The Lagoon Nebula located in the Constellation Sagittarius taken on 26 June 2011 Equipment: 1. SkyWatcher SynScan AZ GOTO mount and tripod 2. Celestron C6S OTA with a Hirsch 6.3 focal reducer 3. Canon EOS 1000D DSLR Image 1. 116 exposures 2. 30 minutes 56 seconds total exposure time 3. 1600 ISO Software 1. Deep Sky Stacker 2. PhotoShop CS5
  12. What can you do with 30 second exposures? 30 seconds is not a lot of time but you can do many DSOs. I attempting to do the Messier List using an azimuth mount and am limited to 20 to 30 second shots. The dimmest objects I have captured to date are M51, M57, and M104. One thing to keep in mind, unless you have a computer controlling your camera, sitting out at night with a remote shutter switch in your hand taking a two or three hundred 30 second exposures is not very exciting. Also noise is a problem as 20 to 30 seconds is not a lot of time for a camera to capture information.
  13. Congratulations on your new telescope. You have a good one. If your mount still works in azimuth, then you probably did not damage anything. Even though the manual says you can manually move the mount in Altitude, I never do as I figure there are only so many such movement in the life of a clutch. macavity's suggestions are excellent. Minimizing tripod wobble. Tripod wobble is a common source of goto error for the SkyWatcher AZ GOTO mount as well as its sibling, the Celestron SLT mount. Fortunately it is easy to fix. Simply tighten all the nuts and bolts on the tripod keeping in mind the soft plastic fittings and low quality steel. Next, do not extend the tripod legs more than about 25%. Be careful tightening the leg clamps. It is easy to over tighten them and pull the brass threaded insert out of the soft plastic leg fittings. Balance. Use a round object like a pencil. Take the scope off the mount. With the diagonal, finder, and 25mm eyepiece attached, place the telescope on a table resting on its dovetail. Place the round object under the dovetail and find the spot where the scope balances. Mark the balance point on the dovetail ( a small dot made by white fingernail polish works fine) when you put the scope back on the mount, have the balance point in the center of the mount's dovetail saddle. The balance point will move a little as you change eyepieces but is not enough to worry about unless you are attaching a camera, etc. Level. your eye is good enough. The mount on the Skywatcher 127 SynScan is very rugged and accurate. It is capable of carrying a 5.5 kg load with no difficulty as long as the load is balanced. I've read reports of people placing 6.8 kg loads but have never done so myself. At present I am running an 8 inch LX200 OTA on my SkyWatcher SynScan AZ goto mount. The mount has no problems with it but the tripod does so I am using a CG5 tripod. In fairness, the mount and tripod are going on their third year of service. You can only tighten tripod nuts and bolts so many times before the soft plastic fittings woller out, etc. The mount is also suitable for photographing, not only the moon and planets, but the brighter DSOs as well. You take multiple exposures then stack. While you can not do as well as the people do with more suitable mounts, you can get fairly decent photographs that compete very well with the film guys as long as you stay about 30 degrees from the zenith. you are limited to 20 to 30 second exposures due to field rotation, mount induced motion, and tripod vibration. see: http://www.flickr.com/photos/59237884@N08/
  14. Tyr, Hi, I did nothing to the SkyWatcher AZ mount. Firmly but not overly tightening the mounting bolt seems more than enough to hold it firmly on the tripod. Currently, I'm in my photography configuration. My C6S is back on the CG5 mount and my 8 inch SCT OTA is on the SkyWatcher mount and SkyWatcher tripod. The SkyWatcher mount and tripod are going into their third year of service now. The mount is as strong as new but the tripod is showing wear .... its soft plastic fittings are the problem as you can tighten metal bolts so much before they pull through, screw holes enlarge, etc. The impact of this is I can no longer control tripod flexure and my goto accuracy with the 8 inch SCT using the SkyWatcher tripod is not as good as it once was. I often have closetos.. just out of view in a 32 mm eyepiece. However, it's still good enough for my needs. I know that the tripod is the problem because the mount's accuracy on the CG5 tripod remains outstanding. I use the C6S for photography because the way I've attached a dovetail to the Meade LX200 OTA is not adequate for photography (one screw on either end). This causes a light rotational movement which is difficult to correct and not good for a photograph but is something that you will never notice visually. The C6S is a pound or so lighter and that also helps. The other night, just for the heck of it, I used the SkyWatcher mount and tripod with the 8 inch SCT attached for a photograph of M57. I think it came out fairly well considering the mount and tripod used. I took a half hour total of exposures but only 6 minutes worth were good enough for DeepSky Stacker to process. edit: I just noticed you have the Celestron SLT mount. I think that anything mechanically that applies to the SkyWatcher AZ mount and tripod will apply to the Celestron SLT mount and tripod as they are essentially clones of each other.
  15. Deep Sky Stacker requires stars to align frames. Your shots of Saturn may not have any. Under advanced in the register setup. Adjust the sensitivity until you are getting 10 to 20 stars. If you have to go down below 4% to do this, either you have no stars or your frames my be not exposed sufficiently for the computer program to register them. With a Canon 1000D, why are you trying to stack photos of Saturn? It's capable of capturing Saturn without the need to stack.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.