Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_dslr_mirrorlesss_winners.thumb.jpg.9deb4a8db27e7485a7bb99d98667c94e.jpg

LittleSkink

Members
  • Content Count

    147
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

38 Excellent

About LittleSkink

  • Rank
    Star Forming

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://sites.google.com/site/thejoyofcanvas

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Interests
    Too many ! Canvas camping, canoes, cameras, jazz
  • Location
    Yorkshire(ish)
  1. you may find Revelation 6mm and especially 4mm, if they are Plossl, hard to use as eye relief is tiny If you dont have a decent Barlow consider one with removable lens element (like Revelation) so you can have 1.5x and 2x My 100p takes 9mm with 1.5x ok but not 2x
  2. Still a newb so I have experimented with all sorts and settled on an A5 spiral bound book and pencil, I try to sketch a circle of what I see (not actually that easy) with notes of eyepiece, constellation I am in etc. Nothing flashy Mostly I was using that to check what I saw back in the warm and annotate the sketches, which definitely helps my with learning my way around the sky. Recently I found something in Cassiopeia that wasn't in my star atlas and it turned out to be Comet Lovejoy
  3. Hi Derek - and others thanks for the reply bumping this thread again as it would be good to sort something With the clocks just changed (and having a young observing partner who has a sensible bed time) I would be restricted to viewing from dusk to maybe 10pm Would after Easter work? maybe a Friday or Saturday evening? We could use Clear Outside to make the final go/no go decision . . .
  4. if you don't wear glasses to observe the choice is pretty wide, but as others have said you might not need anything initially As a newb (who does have to wear glasses) the foirst things I got were a long eye relief 9mm to use in place of the standard 10mm and a decent Barlow to get a range of focal lengths and then decide which I likes/used most One thing I would suggest is a 2x Barlow with removable lens, you can add this to the thread on the bottom of your existing lens for a x1.5 magnification. I got a Revelation one from Astroboot quite cheaply The other thing I have found more useful than I expected is a long focal length (wide angle) lens. The 40mm I got is too much but ready eyepiece threads on here a 32mm is often peoples most used lens
  5. Happy Birthday I picked up an 82A Blue and 11 Yellow/Green recently - only had a few minutes to tinker so far, the latter #11 definitely helped with Jupiter for me
  6. We have a little Heritage 100p and some different eyepieces. During the day we see a "hole in the image". With the entirely inappropriate 40mm projection eye piece you can see it at night too I think I know what is going on (eyepiece exit pupil eye ball entry pupil stuff) but cant get a proper scientific explanation my kids are happy with . . .
  7. Hi mandopicker101 - have you got Stellarium or Carte du Ciels on your PC? If you know the time and direction you can set the time on the software to show you the sky, my hunch is that you were looking at Venus but a time and direction of observation would help - all the planets follow the same "elliptical" so time important Not done much Venus observation, partly from being a novice but also because recently it has usually been to our south in the early evening and that is the street light direction from our house
  8. outstanding, cracking piece of kit - much envy here
  9. I think this post is part confession and part open question - have always been a mechanical kit junky and love nicely made photo gear (ie metal body, manual focus stuff), record players (inc my beautiful Townshend) etc, etc Anyhow Astro stuff seems to be a mixture of lovely engineering (at a price) and err, cheaper . . . tat stuff. Picked up some Revelation Astro things recently and they are so nice to hold and behold, I am definitely a fan - even if it isn't the best optical kit in the world Which leads me to a recent, possibly rash, purchase. Got me a 40mm Revelation Plossl thingy with sliding mount and T thread for less than the cost of the 32mm I was actually thinking would be useful. The 40mm is just so nicely made it had to go in the collection . . . and now I need to find a good use for it or I will be in (domestic) trouble . . . Having tinkered with web cam and afocal photography using a digiscope adaptor gadget the logical next step is probably to get an adaptor or two and try some digicams on it. My guess is the older ones I have might work better than the latest multi megapixel ones. But then again am I going to need a 3x (or more) Barlow to actually see much . . . Hoping it is useful rather than just pretty (fnar fnar)
  10. still 6 copies in Sheffield City yesterday, and still cunningly hidden to show spine only (so you can barely read the title) in Reference section
  11. this can be a frustrating hobby, with so much to learn - more than I expected certainly. It also seems to be that you have to use and live with kit & approaches before you find the things that work for you - I have a dob mount and have been wondering about "upgrading" to an EQ, your experience is pushing me away form that now as a novice I have found a Cambridge Star Atlas (£7 from Astroboot) and Guide to Astronomical Wonders (£12 Amazon marketplace) to be money well spent for may approach to planning, which mostly involves "working a constellation". I have laminated up the star charts from the atlas to scribble on them but not yet found I need to so
  12. bumping an old thread as I have the same question live a few minutes from here and would like to do some observing and meet some fellow observers too actually - cos before I buy scope 2 I want to look through some other folks toys is it worth a night time trip?
  13. okay, so my 9yo has a 100p mini dobsonian and I am hooked - so a bigger/better scope for me seems inevitable really enjoy roaming the sky, splitting doubles, clusters, planets but not finding faint fuzzies very interesting (in a 100p anyhow) so my initial thought was a smallish long refractor on a really solid mount like an EQ5 - so there is an upgrade path to bigger/better scope in the future or the option to get motors and stray in to imaging (which does appeal) Budget is probably around £250 but could stretch to £400. Maybe an Evostar 100/120 on EQ5. I am actively exploring is a s/h EQ5 and separate OTA but haven't been able to try any kit like this locally Another advantage of this route is low cost exit if I don't really get the time / energy / enjoyment - the kit should sell on with little loss One concern is the weight and set up times/hassle - is this really something that can be popped in the garden in a few minutes or go on holiday with us? Not convinced of the Dob mount (based on our 100p admittedly) it doesn't seem very solid or stable - I observe with glasses and it is annoying when the scope keeps moving about at higher magnifications if touched accidentally. So a 200p Dob doesn't really appeal, though I would like to try one sorry, long and complicated question - but welcome some other perspectives
  14. great thread folks - thanks for all the ideas Lovejoy is worth a hunt, though not obvious in polluted skies - I found it by accident (my planning isnt a thorough as yours and often involves exploring constellations one at a time, and I happened to be in Cassiopeia) and am still gob smacked to have seen a real comet with my own eyes
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.