Jump to content

SkySurveyBanner.jpg.21855908fce40597655603b6c9af720d.jpg

FlaviusYNP

New Members
  • Posts

    1
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

19 Good

Profile Information

  • Location
    Yellowstone Park, Wyoming, USA

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Greetings, I'm Rob, a.k.a. Flavius. I'm currently fortunate enough to live at Old Faithful in Yellowstone Park, year-round. When I returned to work in The Park a couple years ago, I promised myself I'd finally get into photography the way I've always wanted to. Yellowstone offers myriad photography challenges from macro to Birds in Flight to DSO, there are great subjects at every level. I got some good wildlife shots my first year, and still throw the tele gear in if I'll be driving through The Park - you never know. But I never really got the wildlife bug. If they show, great, but I'm definitely not going looking for Grizz. There have been at least a couple bad incidents locally in the last decade of so. While I leave animals to chance, their home is stunning in itself. So I added a wide angle lens. And then I remembered wanting to recreate phots I'd seen under moonlight that looked like daylight - except for the telltale stars. I came back with the Artist Point Landscape, attached. Yellowstone has such lush terrain, it seems a crime to ignore it to stare up at the same view everyone has everywhere... Sort of. The airglow can be wicked in summer, often naked-eye visible. I'm watching for the next dip of the Aurora this far South when the moon isn't turning night to day. The I tried the Milky way, basic long exposure on tripod. Fumbled with settings and focus and stuff. But when it I zoomed-in on the first good shot....Oh my God, it's Full of Stars. Of course the clear ky helps. When I looked into it, I realized that Yellowstone does NOT share the same view everyone has. Old Faithful's typically Bortle 2, but a quick drive over the divide leads to one of the last pits of true darkness in USA. Bortle 0 is possible. As it sank in what a treasure pile I sit under, The Astro Bug was foretold. Suddenly I find myself with depleted resources, A pair of Star Adventurer 2is, an Esprit 120 triplet, an AZ-EQ6 mount with Synscan, and a second DSLR - one of Spencer's astro-modded 60Ds. NO dedicated astro camera, NO guiding, just an obsession with Polar Alignment and Image Focus. A few of the ones I like are attached. I get that this is essentially a sky object group, as you might expect from a telescope shop. Are Night Landscapes discouraged, even if the top half is chock-fulla stars? I'll share that motivation can be hit or miss. Astro, like Yellowstone herself, isn't approached ligthly. Everyone has to meet the Polar Alignment guardian at the astro gate. It's hard enough in your backyard. It ranged between 12 and 17F my last night out. It hit 6F one time. My hands inevitably crap-out unless think to use chemical warmers from the start. I like to shoot in the geyser basins - great for Night Landscape, but the geysers literally dump clouds (and often boiling water) directly out of the ground. The lay of the land always seems to route the fog intermittently in front of Polaris. If I can catch PA on a 2i, II call myself lucky. And if not...I'll come home with SOMETHING. I tried landscape mode tracking of Orion a couple night ago when Polaris was being extra-Puckish. It kept the constellation from running away, and the full moon out of the frame. It was partly cloudy anyhoo, the effect was nice in timelapse. Of course the big animals are still everywhere, you just can't see them as well. Bison tend to sleep, but they wander about some, too. I'll usually see and almost always hear coyotes in the basins, wolves and grizzlies are entirely within the realm of possible. When a stick snaps in the woods it's hard to keep focus on the glory above. These are in front of my "house," tracked exposures: The thermal basins are a close lure, but any serious Astro-only is better conducted on the dark side of the hill. My first try with the Esprit 120 yielded a single exposure of - yup the Orion Nebula - attached, from Lake Butte, in the black zone. I really need an Astro-buddy. Or at least a wagon. The scope has to be car-based, of course, but I'll pack 2 cams, 3 lenses, a tripod AND tracker and gimp along as best I can. Just having someone shine the red light down the polar hole would save some angst. I feel like exposure and focus are getting under control, now it's resource management and refining my post-skills. There's meant to be nothing realistic about my Landscapes - we're peering into a hidden world only our eyes keep us from seeing. Who knows how an owl or coyote sees the night? To me, the subjectivity extracted in Post is a big part of the magic. All the obsession of guide scope variance, stacking, stretching, more effort toward "objective" post-processing... I'm seeing a cooking/baking dichotomy. Y'all are bakers, precision and consistency are essential to good outcome. I might be too much of a cook for Astro, we'll see. Lake Butte, after the moon set 120 Triplet: Thanks for letting me in!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.