Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Coxy80

New Members
  • Posts

    19
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Coxy80

  1. 8 hours ago, Carbon Brush said:

    Hi. My thoughts are in a different direction.
    A big reflector will gather the light, like an SCT. However, the faster focal ratio producing wider views may be better suited to a manual mount.
    Especially if you combine it with wide AFOV eyepieces.
    However, if you have the encoder/Nexus add ons, the argument tilts towrds the SCT.

    Why not buy a battered old 8" newt and give it a try?
    You can sell it on at little or no loss.
    I would offer you loan of an 8" or 10" scope, having a couple of old ones in need of TLC. But you are a long way from me.

    Thanks an 8" newt would certainly be cheaper, would it not put the eyepiece in awkward position in relation to the refractor ??

  2. On 29/01/2023 at 19:23, DeanCJ said:

    Hi Coxy

    My wife and I have the Altair Starwave version of your scope albeit with fpl 51 glass. We also have a Skywatcher az-eq5 mount. We often use this in alt-az dual saddle configuration, this is rated I believe at 15 kg per side, and pair the refractor with a Celestron 8”sct, the mount handles this size/weight combination easily. We find that 8” really starts to show dso’s well and compliments the refractor very well. 
    we also have a 127 Mak but tend not to use this much as the views are quite similar, on really good nights the Mak will be better on lunar and planetary, but not by much, and on most nights the refractor is better, the Ring Nebula for example, in the Mak l use averted vision more but with the refractor it kind of just pops out without. I think this is where the central obstruction and contrast comes into play. 
    So, if you are thinking about a Mak or sct I would be thinking about 150mm or bigger, bearing in mind, an 8”sct weighs more or less the same as a 150 Mak, but has greater aperture, this was for us a better mounting option.

    Hope this is helpful.

     

    Cheers Dean I had thought about an Celestron C8 XLT, need to get saving or look for a second hand one. 

  3. I have a Rowan AZ75 mount set up with a fantastic Starfield 102mm f/7 ED Doublet Refractor that I am enjoying very much. I would like to purchase another scope that would complement the refractor and go on the other side of the mount ideally something with some more aperture to view some deep sky objects. This set up will be purely for visual. 

    Does anyone have any suggestions of what to look at ??

    Thanks in advance! 

     

  4. 15 hours ago, powerlord said:

    I just use 5v USB ones for all refractors and guidescopes. About 15 quid each from amazon.

    Mine all powered by dc 5v psu, but USB power banks work fine. No need for expensive 12v astro stuff.

    Just search for lens dew heater on amazon.

    I use these ones:

    KIWIFOTOS Lens Heater Warmer Dew Heater Strip with Temperature Regulator for Universal Camera Lens Telescopes Eyepieces Heating, Dew Remover Lens Heater Warmer https://amzn.eu/d/0jiLsCp

    Stu

    Do you think a power bank like this would power a couple of the usb strips in your link? 

    https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B0BBGPMT2H/ref=ox_sc_act_title_1?smid=A1TW3I98UKHHWA&th=1

  5. Having bought a new scope over a month ago and suffered a month of clouds and rain I've finally been able to get out with it a bit despite super low temperatures. It has been below -10 here for quite a few nights, the last couple of nights have warmed up a bit.

    I was out last night in what was maybe -3 and had my fist glimpse of a few Messier objects and throughly enjoyed it but ended up plagued by my eyepieces constantly misting up. 

    Upon packing up I also notice that the main objective was also misted up. 

    My question is will this happen most nights in what is a damp cold part of the UK (Scottish Borders) and will dew prevention of some sort be an essential thing to have? 

    Clear sky's are rare here and don't want to waste them but also don't want to send money on something that won't be needed much. 

    My equipment is a Starfield 102mm f/7 ED Doublet Refractor with a selection of Baader morpheus eyepieces. 

  6. I'm looking for help choosing a refractor purely for visual use.

    It will be mounted on a Rowan AZ75 with a Nexus 11 using Sky Safari to find targets.

    I want something that will be a good all rounder for planets, lunar and brighter deep sky objects. 

    I live in a bortle 4 area with easy access to bortle 3 within a 15 minute drive. 

    I was looking at something like Starfield 102mm f/7 ED Doublet Refractor , Sky-Watcher Evostar 100ED DS-Pro or StellaMira 110mm ED f/6 Refractor Telescope but open to any other suggestions and pros and cons of the above. Or are there other options instead of a refractor I should consider? 

    My current acquired equipment list consists of a Skywatcher Heritage 130P , Altair Starwave 70ED + Baader Morpeus 17.5, 9 and 6.5mm . 

    Thanks in advance for any help. 

    • Like 3
  7. 12 minutes ago, Coxy80 said:

    I've ordered and received the following tripod from FLO Uni 28 for AZ-EQ5 as it was the only one they had in stock plus the following adapter https://www.firstlightoptics.com/tripods/astro-essentials-3-8-photo-adapter-for-heq5-az5-tripod.html is this a sensible way to do things?? 

    I'm just about to unpack things and check everything works! 

    Everything seams to fit and feels solid enough!

    926BDE78-B802-4068-A7F3-52B7223F67DB.heic 269AE52E-0C25-464B-B911-84523B52FAD2.heic ECC6575F-5FDE-482E-9462-33F1B859BAAB.heic 4ED427BE-1000-46D6-9DB2-B232C44F0CEC.heic

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.