Jump to content



  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

13 Good

About pjmaciw

  • Rank

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. The Arduino code is given below. I take no credit for this as I pasted and modded other examples that I found on the internet to see what worked. I cannot remember or find the exact sites I found but thank you all. Update - Found it ...... this was the site that got me started - http://vincechanblog.ca/blog/?p=47 SkySafariEncoder_v0.3.ino
  2. I have just completed a small project to add encoders to my 12" Dob and connect it up using Bluetooth to the SkySafari app running on phone or tablet. I am amazed how good this setup is. I managed to move effortlessly from one object to another and have never viewed so many objects in one hour. I used an Arduino nano with bluetooth adapter and a couple of cheap encoders from China (£9 each off Ebay) all hooked up with patch wires, so no need to solder. It fits neatly into a small plastic box and is powered from a small phone battery pack. The whole build only cost about £50 and has t
  3. Hi, Happy to wait if you don't mind making the ally plate. Absolutely no rush, just email me when you are ready. Kind Regards, Pete.
  4. Hi, I may be interested in the tripod as one of the leg clamps on my EQ3-2 tripod has broken. I am in Reading and wondered how far away you are. Kind Regards, Pete.
  5. Hi, If you still have the dob upgrade kit I'd like to buy. If you send your paypal details I will transfer money and forward delivery address. Kind Regards, Pete
  6. Astroboot have come up with the goods. One o-ring on it's way. Just need some clear skies now! Thanks for your replies and suggestions.
  7. Hi, I have just brought a used Skywatcher 250 dob but the 50x8 Finder scope is without the o-ring so it flops about and is useless. Does anyone know what diameter the o-ring cross section is or where I can buy one from. I have ordered a Rigel QuickFinder but it would be nice to have the finder scope working as well. Thanks, Pete.
  8. Wow. That was quick. Thanks Red Dwarf I haven't had chance to try it yet but it looks like it could be good for planets.
  9. Hi, I need some help identifying a telescope. It came with a Tal mount so I initially thought it was a Tal 150K but the photos tell a different story. It appears to be a 6" (150mm) SCT of some description. It's very well made and heavy. The focussing is by a standard rack and pinion and not by moving the primary mirror as in SCT's. I think it dates from the 1980s. So, there is the challenge. What is it?
  10. Hi Steve, I have had a Quattro 10" steel tube since they came out and am very pleased with it. (see my review on FLO). One down side is that you are supposed to have good quality ep's although I have made do with the ep's I already had and still really enjoy the views. I mainly use it for imaging and manage to get good pics with minimum hassle. If you have any specific questions I will try to answer. Pete.
  11. I decided to get a few Televue eyepieces to work with my Quattro 10" F4 reflector. I managed to get a Nagler 13mm and very good it is too. I already have a Televue 8mm plossl and Televue 2x barlow, The question is what to get next? I was thinking of a 19 or 24mm Panoptic or possibly going the other way with a 6mm Delos. I only want (can afford) one ep for now, so what would be the best choice. All suggestions welcome but must be Televue. Thanks, Pete.
  12. Brilliant picture ..... love the detail in the dust lanes. I also took a pic of this galaxy but nowhere near as much detail as you have captured. Did you do any special processing to bring out the dust detail? I do struggle with the processing and don't do anything fancy yet .... still learning. Also, I see you have taken lots of darks and flats which I do not do at the moment. Do the darks and flats make much difference to the final pics. Anyway, great pic...keep up the good work. Regards, Pete
  13. I was out till late last night but pleased with the result from a light polluted back garden in Reading. The pics were made up of 10x10 minute subs for NGC 4565 taken with BackyardEOS and my trusty 550D (unmodded). The tracking played up on the M108/97 pic so I stopped after 5 subs. I have decided that I have not been taking long enough exposures and now adjust the exposure using the histogram on BackyardEOS with much better results needing minimal processing. I do not take darks, bias or flats as it takes enough time taking the lights but I will get around to experimenting more one day. N
  14. Very nice animation Mel. I suppose having a modded cam helps with the red. That's another thing that I wonder about. With an unmodded dslr can I still get similar pics to a modded dslr if I increase the exposure or is the info completely filtered out in an unmodded dslr. Back on subject - It occurs to me that only the flats may be useful and I can propably not worry about bias and dark frames, for now at least. I think I shall try to get some flats next time and see if I can see what difference they make. Pete.
  15. Up until now all my photo's were snaps to see if this or that worked and to set up my equipment. On Sunday it was a clear night so I thought I would have a proper attempt at taking some subs, stacking and processing. This is the result of 50 x 30 sec subs, stacked and processed. I have real trouble with the processing but now feel that I am getting there. I did not take any bias, dark or flat frames and am not quite sure how they would change the final image. The thought of taking dark frames is not very appealing. Are bias, darks and flats needed with DSLR's considering the high pixel cou
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.