Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

SH2-91 (Ha+OIII)


AstroGS

Recommended Posts

This was a target that I came up by lack while I was browsing the new images in Astrobin.

SH2-91 is part of the larger Cygnus Loop and a remnant of a supernova explosion that occurred around 10,000 to 20,000 years ago. It features intricate filaments and delicate structures that emit a striking glow, primarily in the Ha primarily wavelength, as well as OIII.

It took me just over 42 hours to capture Ha + OIII data of 600 sec subs, using the RedCat61 + ASI2600MM + Antlia 3nm Ha + Chroma 5nm OIII filters.

Processed in PI and PS. 

I am sharing the full size final image + a cropped one that I personally liked. Please feel free to add any comments or suggestions.

 

FULL_SH2_91.thumb.jpg.d80ce5b50ec764d6818479be9ab650c5.jpg

 

Image74_clone.thumb.jpg.29941f3e96b0fe2426e155120378a3ea.jpg

 is part of the larger Cygnus Loop and is

Edited by AstroGS
  • Like 14
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually re-worked it and combined it as an HOO - personally this looks more natural vs the previous ones.

Of course any suggestion or criticism is welcome 😉

 

ImageNewV2.thumb.jpg.cf2c94d6c703573bc9dcc7e59ec93f31.jpg

ImageNewV2Cropped.thumb.jpg.3ebb60c9680e89f32ada7c59e257c5a0.jpg

Edited by AstroGS
  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both renditions are great, nice detail in the whisps. 42 hours of 600s subs suggests this must be a pretty faint part of the Cygnus loop! Wow.

Usually I’m more for “natural” colour images but actually I really like the original rendition in this case too.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WolfieGlos said:

Both renditions are great, nice detail in the whisps. 42 hours of 600s subs suggests this must be a pretty faint part of the Cygnus loop! Wow.

Usually I’m more for “natural” colour images but actually I really like the original rendition in this case too.

Interestingly, the 2nd rendition was not just a re-coloured version of the first but, I worked it from scratch, using the Gradient Correction process as well as the manual stretch process, which resulted better colour depth and a more 3D effect. It shows that both processing steps can make a huge difference in the final image.

 

p.s. of course the 2nd image is processed differently re the colours combination.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.