Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

Steel and Concrete EQ pier.


marcopolo

Recommended Posts

Making good progress with the 1930's Newtonian scope rebuild on cast iron GEM EQ mount. About 180kg for the scope+GEM mount/head. This weekend is dopping the pier in. I've got a couple of questions though one regarding alignment and two regarding the concrete pouring. I'll start with the latter.

1.The steel i'm using is heavy duty 6in x 6in square section 1/4in+ thick steel. I've got good long sections so how deep I go and how much sticks up above ground is basically how far I choose to dig. The thing i'm wondering is. If I backfill the hole AND the inside of the tube at the same time is there the chance that when the concrete level rises in the tube ABOVE ground level, will it try to overflow round the outside or can I just make the concrete viscous enoguh not to do this? My gut instinct is it will be ok if I tap down on the tube top it will ebbed a bit in hte bottom of the hole and therefore not flow out into the hole from the tube. However this leads to my next question....

2. Is it better to float the base of the steel tube ABOVE the bottom of the ground a bit say by 4-6in so you have a continuous concrete piece running inside of the tube to the dug hole? (I could float it for example with a small strap of wood). Or am I overthinking this and just throw it in and pour? If the latter the internal concrete in the tube  is pointless other than to increase overall mass (vibration dampening I suppose) as it's not pysically tied to the concrete in the dug hole.

3. I was going to alight the square tube ROUGHLY N/S with polaris by clamping a long baton of wood to one side, put my phone compass on the end away from the steel and settign to about 1.5deg E on my phone compass. Magnetic declination at my loaction is -1.05deg (W), polaris is at 0.43 Az (E). I'm not too worried as i've built about 5deg adjustment into the wedge interface anyway. but it would be nice to be close. Does this sound reasonable?

 

Thanks,

MArco.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.