Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

IC 1318 in Hubble Palette (from a couple of months ago)


GordonH

Recommended Posts

Hi All

Just been catching up on some processing and tweaking of images. I took this image of IC 1318 earlier on when Cygnus was more overhead. It is taken with 6x10 minute unguided subframes per filter using Ha, OIII and SII in the HST palette, there certainly is a lot going on in this region as far as nebulosity is concerned and this image only covers a small area of it. Sadr is the bright star in the middle. I took a Ha only image of the same region earlier on and this can be seen in the nebulae section of the image gallery on my website http://www.imagingtheheavens.co.uk for comparison

Taken with TMB 115 and Starlight Xpress H36

Thanks for looking

Best wishes

Gordon

post-13589-133877351219_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi guys

Thanks for the comments, I had an email from Richard Crisp of http://www.narrowbandimaging.com who gave me some useful tips to bring out a bit more detail in the OIII and SII data while making the Ha a bit less green and predominant, so I had a go at tweaking the levels, curves and colour balance and came very close to what he showed me, I certainly think it is better but it has introduced some noise into the image which is more evident on the full resolution image, anyway here it is for comparison

Best wishes

Gordon

post-13589-133877351238_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Paul

Yes I have seen this site, amazing colour contrasts and I presume he has some special techniques to bring out the extra subtleties, I think I saw an image he did of the California nebula which clearly showed all emission lines and RC had never managed to get any OIII in this image, I agree with you comments about RC, there is no point in getting into a discussion with him about something where you disagree with him as he has his own way of doing things and that is that. My view is that photography is a form of art no matter what type of photography or what type of filter you use and as such it should be left up to the artist to be creative and offer his interpretation of how he sees the subject even if the end result is not exactly as it "should appear", as I have said before it would be terribly boring if everybody produced exactly the same image of M42 ie same shape, same amount of nebulosity, same colour balance, etc. Although I see his point and I agree with what he says, at the same time I believe there is more than one way to skin a cat. Some people may find it hard to accept that I don't use autoguiding, that I don't use flat field frames (yet) and quite often I use simple autodark subtraction in Maxim DL rather than taking 10 dark frames, median combining, etc before subtracting, but at the moment it works for me and I am happy with the results.

Anyway that is enough of me ranting

Best wishes

Gordon

:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very nice image Gordon.

I agree with your comments about each image being a work of art. Astrophotography is a fascinating combination of art and science, and at the end of the day, the results do the talking, and yours are consistently first class.

Cheers

Rob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.