Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

vlnikolic

New Members
  • Posts

    17
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by vlnikolic

  1. 47 minutes ago, Don Pensack said:

    If it is fungus, you must remove it immediately or it will spread.

    Try acetone on a Q-Tip first, something stronger if acetone doesn't work.

    dear sir - thank you for your reply.

     

    i am sorry if i sound silly but:

    i've already used this eyepiece with the 2" diagonal mirror. in the setup mirror was under the eyepiece (horizontal telescope position)

    maybe i've infected the mirror as well?

  2. hello everybody,

     

    this morning i've received my st120 scope, and some equipment.. i've received lacerta 30 mm 2" ED as well.

    i am not sure if this eyepiece is maybe damaged, so i would like to hear your opinion. eyepiece is very pleasant to use, and it seems to me that it works well, although i've tried it during daytime - just to check it. however it is possible to see a small cracks or maybe some foggy production residues in two sides / in the very end of the ocular. please see pictures and videos here:

    https://photos.app.goo.gl/HR4PTQsfFjn6eK6F7

    since i have very limited experience, my question would be:

    is this eyepiece damaged?

     

    thanks

    vlad

     

     

     

  3. hello again

     

    i would like to know your opinion on these two different eyepieces configurations for st120

    (diagonal mirror would be 2" 99% with adapter for 1.25 ep)

     

    configuration1:

    ep: 4mm 12mm 20mm (decent quality fov ~65) + decent barlow 2x, thus giving:

    4mm+B (300x), 4mm (150x), 12mm+B (100x), 20mm+B (60x), 12mm (50x), 20mm (30x)

     

    configuration2:

    ep: 4mm 8mm 12mm 20mm (decent quality fov ~65) + decent barlow 2x, thus giving:

    4mm (150x), 8mm (75x), 12mm (50x), 20mm (30x)

     

    both configurations in conjunction with fringe-killer 1.25 (for eyepieces, and not 2" that could be attached to diag.mirr, as far as i understand)

     

    thanks..

    : )

  4. vlaiv, thanks for a detailed reply. i think that i've leared a lot in the meantime (a lot compared to my starting position hehe)

    i was thinking about yet another possibility:

    SkyWatcher Startravel 120T AZ3

    why?

    * it's 120

    * short focal length means that even less potent is for planets however, but i do presume that is somewhat in the class of meade102inf

    * it has 45* amici prism, and in conjunction with az3 land observations should be very pleasant

    * as far as i understand it supports 2" eyepieces, thus in perspective i could acquire 90* diagonal, barlow, and some good eyepieces for nice skygazing

    0: )

    btw i tried my luck  with "astronomski forum" again and hope the best

    hehe

     

  5. vlaiv,

    thank you for a detailed explanation (hvala lepo). i've just seen that you are from novi sad, and that provides me with opportunity to ask you for even more recommendation about purchasing this thing.. and i can buy you a drink without any problem, since i am from kragujevac. since we both live in serbia - we know that availability of equipment to buy is also a limit..

    makutsov is a great idea really - but i am not sure about maintenance and general robustness of these devices / is there need for collimation with this type of scopes.

    : )

  6. hello and thank you all once again for your time and energy.

    i would like to have something up to 500 eur

    i have idea to use it on a balcony of my house - and i have view on the hills and a factory in the front.

    since i am in a town, light pollution i would categorize as medium (side lights / street lights i have to deal with as well)

    i have no particular intention of moving the thing to better watching spots (at least i think like that for now). i've used to watch the land and the sky from the same balcony using the monocular 8x42 for a long time.

    i would not categorize myself as a star/sky gazer, rather somebody who would like to enjoy the place he lives by observation.

    vlad

  7. hello everybody,

     

    i would like to use a telescope for observation of landscape and observation of celestial objects. i have several scopes on my mind and i would like to have your opinion - because i would like to have one telescope for all my needs (i am not so demanding user, so i think it is possible).

    i was thinking about these two refractors:

    1) BRESSER Taurus 90/900 NG

    https://www.bresser.de/en/Astronomy/Telescopes/BRESSER-Taurus-90-900-NG-Refractor-with-Smartphone-Camera-Adapter.html

    i like this scope, because it is all-in-one package, the only downside i found is that objective is 9 cm.

    2) Meade Infinity 102mm AZ Refractor

    https://www.meade.com/infinitytm-102mm-refracting-telescope.html

    this one i found interesting because of it's objective lens (10cm), and its length - allowing me larger field of view for landscape observations

    i was thinking about this reflector as well:

    3) BRESSER Telescope Spica 130/650 EQ3

    https://www.bresser.de/en/Astronomy/Telescopes/BRESSER-Telescope-Spica-130-650-EQ3-parabolic-Reflector-with-Smartphone-Camera-Adapter.html

    i am aware that this one is on eq mount, and that it's not for landscape observations - but i could buy eyepiece that will modify the image for landscape use, and this eq mount could be very useful for gazing into the sky. for this one i would by collimator, and this eyepiece, and i would have the complete amateur package, and for any of the refractors i could by maybe some better 6mm eyepiece, and solar / moon filter.

     

    thanks for your time and interest, any suggestion is welcome

    : )

    vlad

     

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.