Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

hamishbarker

New Members
  • Posts

    5
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by hamishbarker

  1. Did your Stevick-Paul get completed? I just completed a 160mm f15 version. (I had a very long focus primary, but anyway had to refigure it as it had shocking astigmatism which I only discovered on assembly of the telescope. I made my own convex secondary and concave tertiary. All coatings apart from the quaternary flat are silver, for best reflectivity.

     

    I did some investigation with the OSLO-edu optics software and it appears that tolerances for focal length and spacing along the optical path are actually quite loose. It's just the angles which are a bit more critical. Collimation has gone quite well and i get nice views but at 160mm aperture it's no light bucket. Mine has a tube for the secondary/tertiary/quaternary mirrors and focuser, while the primary is slung below the tube via a hexapod truss allowing both angle and position adjustments. I have a thread over on the ATM section of the big other astronomy forum starting with C.

    • Like 1
  2. Yes, I was thinking about that the other day. I guess the internal reflection would be at least 4-6% so no good if one is trying to achieve a decent S/N. I will have a look. I've been concentrating my spare time on finishing the figuring of a big telescope mirror which has been lingering for a couple of years.

    Multiple images in the guiding camera are not such a big problem I suppose, especially if they are only faint.

  3. An old thread but perhaps worth a repost: I scavenged some nice front surface mirrors (presumably alu on glass) from an old scanner/printer. There were 5 mirrors!

    I tried making reflective slits by cutting the alu lightly with a hobby knife along a straight edge.

    Testing with a laser pointer and measuring the diffration pattern indicated that light scoring made a 23um slit, while heavier pressure with a dull tip made about 50um slit.

    Looking at the slit under  a magnifier, it looks nice and straight. So will try it in my home built transmission scope (uses old pentax 50mm and 28mm lenses and a piece of 1000lpmm plastic transmission grating but the home made pencil sharpener slit was not even and not reflective)..

    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.