Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Skytee 2 Alt-Az Mount on Photo Tripod


johninderby

Recommended Posts

Another installment in the Skytee-2 saga :D

Although I am pleased with the Skytee 2 Alt-Az mount on an HEQ5 pillar I wanted to try it on a good heavy duty photo tripod for a more grab'n'go setup.

I already had a nice solid Manfrotto 475 tripod, but the only problem is that it has a 3/8" fitting and the Skytee 2 has an M10 connection. After looking around I found that Berlebach in Germany makes 3/8 to M10 adaptor that allows you to fit any standard astro mount such as an EQ5 or Skytee 2 to a photo tripod. You simply screw the adaptor onto the bottom of the Skytee 2 mount and then screw it down onto the tripod.

I've tested it with my solar observing setup (Lunt60 Ha & TS80/480APO) and it's really solid with virtually instantaneous settle down times if you tap one f the scopes.

I've also briefly tested it with a 6" f/8 newt and the TS80 APO and it's still good, although vibration settle down times are a few seconds. While the vibrations are settling down they are a slow speed oscillation that doesn't really interfere too much with observing.

So overall the combination of the Skytee 2 and Manfrotto 475 tripod really works. The solar setup can easily be carried outside fully set-up and ready to go so it meets my definition of grab'n'go. Or of course it would easily handle a 4" or 5" refractor and still be grab'n'go. :rolleyes:

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was looking at the adapter to mount my Giro III on my Giotos 9730 photo tripod.

The Giro has the Vixen EQ5/HEQ5 fitting. Do you think, with the bit that has the M10 thread in it sticking out 2 cm it would fit the adapter?

post-19015-133877562495_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was looking at the adapter to mount my Giro III on my Giotos 9730 photo tripod.

The Giro has the Vixen EQ5/HEQ5 fitting. Do you think, with the bit that has the M10 thread in it sticking out 2 cm it would fit the adapter?

I think it should fit but I'll check the dimensions of the adaptor and let you know tomorrow. :D

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was looking at the adapter to mount my Giro III on my Giotos 9730 photo tripod.

The Giro has the Vixen EQ5/HEQ5 fitting. Do you think, with the bit that has the M10 thread in it sticking out 2 cm it would fit the adapter?

Here's a rough sketch of the adaptor.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

What is the name of the adaptor that fits on top of the M10 as I gonna order the tripod and the SkyTee-2 mount and what else would I need as I wanna house a Skywatcher 127 Mak on this and later on a Skywatcher small shorttube refractor. What is the name of the supplier that stocks the adaptor. Many Thanks :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does that Berleback adaptor fit on to the SkyTee-2 and would I be able to fit both on any camera tripod. I have a 127 Mak and would that be OK to fit and will this set up be able to cope with the weight of a 127 Mak OTA!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes the adaptor will fit onto the photo tripod which then allows any mount with an EQ5 type fitting (EQ5, Skytee 2 etc.) to fit. However with the Skytee 2 you will need a heavy duty photo tripod, at least a load capacity of 12kg. Should be OK with a small 127 OTA.

Please note though that while it will work OK it won't be quite as solid as a proper astro tripod.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 10 years later...

Yeah that’s quite a dig up!!! But I thought the title was perfect. 
 

question is simple: what photo tripod would you recommend for a skytee 2? I already have a manfrotto element which is I believe given for an 8kg charge. Not enough I think  

would be for a C8. Thx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use the same tripod as the OP from 11 years ago did/does, a Manfrotto 475/475B or 058/058B.  I picked them up used for $75 and $150, respectively.  Check for the older Bogen numbers as well, 3036/3236 and 3051/3251, respectively, to save even more money.  You might save a bundle on them.  The black versions are cooler looking, but the silver versions are generally cheaper on the used market.

I like the variable angle spreaders on them so I can level them without extending the leg sections.  I always observe sitting down, so height isn't an issue.  I also like the cranked elevator for changing eyepiece height between horizon and zenith observing.  The 26 pound capacity is nice when I have my DSV-2B, 90mm APO, and 127 Mak all together on it.  Add in 2" diagonals and either ES-92 eyepieces or binoviewers, and the weight adds up pretty quickly.  I'm pushing the limit of what that elevator can handle.

I'd like to get a Bogen 3058/3258 or Manfrotto 161MK2/161MK2B for their 44 pound capacity.  I have no idea how today's flimsy photo tripods can claim 33 pound capacity as in the case of the Sirui AM 284.  That's 7 pounds more than the Manfrotto 475.  Can a 3.5 pound carbon fiber tripod really be that much stronger than a 9.5 pound aluminum tripod?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.